Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 22, 2016 at 7:04 history edited cde CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body
Jun 22, 2016 at 7:04 comment added Mari-Lou A I did not change the meaning of the post, I corrected a few grammatical errors in a question, which otherwise, I quite liked. However, "it's prequel" means "IT IS prequel", which does not make sense. I also corrected that error but you've changed it to its previous version. You want the possessive pronoun "its". The other errors which I edited, you have accepted, or changed into the plural. E.g. * Which other scene was changed?* you changed into the plural which is fine, but your original post had: which is the other scenes I opted for the singular noun because you mentioned two scenes.
Jun 21, 2016 at 22:43 history edited cde CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Jun 21, 2016 at 15:37 history edited cde CC BY-SA 3.0
added 3 characters in body
Jun 21, 2016 at 15:23 comment added Rand al'Thor You seem to be quite defensive about this question, judging from your two rollbacks on it :-)
Jun 21, 2016 at 14:47 history rollback cde
Rollback to Revision 3
S Jun 21, 2016 at 13:37 history suggested Mari-Lou A CC BY-SA 3.0
improved grammar
Jun 21, 2016 at 12:11 review Suggested edits
S Jun 21, 2016 at 13:37
Jun 21, 2016 at 7:17 review Suggested edits
Jun 21, 2016 at 7:22
Dec 7, 2015 at 21:14 vote accept cde
Dec 7, 2015 at 0:22 comment added Napoleon Wilson Congratulations, this question is the winner of the corresponding topic challenge.
Nov 30, 2015 at 22:35 comment added cde @BCdotWEB I don't agree it was bad English. If anything the edit was grammatically wrong. It wouldn't be "during filming" it would be "while filming". Filming not being a noun, and his passing not being on stage/being filmed.
Nov 30, 2015 at 22:26 comment added BCdotWEB @cde Why did you roll back my edits? Why shouldn't Hoffman's full name be used in the title? And "during the middle of filming for" is simply bad English, it's either "during filming" or "in the middle of filming", but not a combination of both.
Nov 30, 2015 at 14:53 answer added Roger timeline score: 14
Nov 30, 2015 at 12:50 comment added Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 @DrRDizzle - I saw some CGI in at least one point. There was a view where Plutarch was standing in line with his head turned towards the left pointing at the camera. IIRC, it was during one of Coin's speeches. You could definitely tell Hoffman's image was imposed over someone else's. The lines were blurry around the face and it didn't quite fit correctly on the body. A very poor job, if you ask me.
Nov 30, 2015 at 11:04 history tweeted twitter.com/StackMovies/status/671283718573703168
Nov 30, 2015 at 9:11 history rollback cde
Rollback to Revision 1
Nov 30, 2015 at 9:05 history edited BCdotWEB CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 18 characters in body; edited title
Nov 30, 2015 at 9:02 comment added cde @DrRDizzle just <strike>got my mind blown to itty bitty bits</strike> saw it a few hours ago, and I notice no Redenbacher'ed Plutarch. Maybe I was distracted.
Nov 30, 2015 at 8:56 comment added Dr R Dizzle "The rest, we just didn’t have him appear in those scenes. There’s no digital manipulation or CG fabrication of any kind." - Having scene The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2 recently, I find this hard to believe. A CGI Phillip Seymour Hoffman really stood out to me at one point.
Nov 30, 2015 at 7:42 history asked cde CC BY-SA 3.0