Timeline for Is every appearance of a product in a movie sponsored?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2023 at 7:46 | comment | added | OldPadawan | "to use an Audi, Jack Daniels or an iphone": has this been sponsored? :) | |
| Aug 6, 2014 at 5:42 | answer | added | Jeff-Inventor ChromeOS | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 2, 2014 at 22:17 | vote | accept | squarlson | ||
| Aug 2, 2014 at 22:15 | history | edited | magnattic |
added some appropiate tags
|
|
| Aug 2, 2014 at 22:15 | answer | added | Crow T Robot | timeline score: 16 | |
| Aug 2, 2014 at 22:13 | comment | added | magnattic | Good question, but maybe a little broad, as I imagine that every production studio has their own way of handling these things. And the answer to "Is every appearance of a product in a movie sponsored?" is clearly no, and finding a single counterexample should be easy. But knowing this site, I am sure someone will come up with a good answer to cover the whole topic. | |
| Aug 2, 2014 at 21:58 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMovies/status/495690051758862336 | ||
| Aug 2, 2014 at 21:55 | comment | added | DustinDavis | Good question. I've noticed quite a few times where the actors are holding products, but with the labels not showing. Though you can clearly tell a coke can even if the label isn't showing. For those times the labels do show, I wondered if they were sponsored or not. | |
| Aug 2, 2014 at 21:16 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 2, 2014 at 22:03 | |||||
| Aug 2, 2014 at 21:13 | history | asked | squarlson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |