Timeline for Why didn't humanity fight in oblivion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2016 at 12:44 | comment | added | Brain | Most movies are based heavily on symbology, therefore they seem to lack a certain amount of logic. For example in Matrix why should the machines depend on solar energy? Would it not be easier to build nuclear or fusion reactors? But this would hinder the progress of the story based on the mythology. So when you recognize a lack in logic, look for symbology first. If you do not find anything related to symbology or mythologic patterns, then it is simply a lack of logic. | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 23:28 | answer | added | Mistah Mix | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 22:54 | comment | added | DustinDavis | "Our arsenal is big enough to take out the Tet, isn't it?" Who's arsenal? Real life human race or the movie version of the human race? There is a big difference. | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 21:51 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson | Your last question is a bit speculative and I'm not sure what answer you're awaiting to get from the movie for this (and in fact it might even be an answer to the previous question why they didn't nuke it). | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 21:50 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson | @SystemDown He's more after shooting some nukes at the Tet, which I'm not sure the humans even tried. | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 21:49 | history | edited | Napoleon Wilson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Mar 18, 2014 at 21:23 | comment | added | System Down | How do you know they didn't fight? Memory is hazy, but I recall that humanity did fight, but lost. | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 21:00 | history | asked | user4677 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |