Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 26, 2021 at 2:58 comment added Acccumulation "I am therefore guessing that the art of creating such a device was lost in the years since they were first made." That seems to be reasonable. It sure would be problematic story-telling if it were established that people can just make new ones willy-nilly.
Feb 1, 2018 at 16:14 comment added Joshua All the requisite ability is available to them to reconstruct time travel had they the wit to find it. But in the era it was set, the greatest of our scientists if put to the question might not realize they know all the pieces even given a technique that can construct any mundane object.
S Aug 23, 2012 at 20:03 history suggested PriestVallon CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed Grammar
Aug 23, 2012 at 19:50 review Suggested edits
S Aug 23, 2012 at 20:03
May 9, 2012 at 17:26 history edited Codemwnci CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 characters in body
Dec 8, 2011 at 18:03 comment added Codemwnci I think that Rowling didn't really want to play with time, but it was a path she felt was necessary for the direction of the story. As such, there are going to be inconsistencies and open questions, because time travel offers an unparalleled scope, and it would be difficult, impractical and boring for the reader if they were all tied up neatly.
Dec 5, 2011 at 9:33 comment added Stephan Muller You raise an interesting point. If they are so rare and can not be reproduced, why would Dumbledore give such a thing to Hermione just for taking more classes? There would be so much more useful things to do. Then again, as Dumbledore said, his greatest wish was a pair of warm socks. He of all people would know the danger of using very powerful things to do something you think is good. Instead of wishing for more power to make the world better, and instead of using the Time Turner to destroy Voldie, he used it for 'good' on a smaller scale.
Dec 2, 2011 at 14:32 comment added Lauren Good point. I remembered that Hermione didn't have the Time Turner until the third year, but it seems a little odd that Dumbledore would give it to her in order to take classes, but not give it to Harry (or use it himself) in order to save lives. Also - now that you mention it I remember that in the books, the Time Turners were destroyed during the battle at the Ministry. But I'm not sure they pointed that out in the movie, did they? If not, they should have!
Dec 2, 2011 at 0:28 history answered Codemwnci CC BY-SA 3.0