Timeline for Would Sandhanam have been evil if it hadn't been for Rolex?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 at 23:02 | history | edited | Ankit Sharma♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| May 17, 2023 at 4:30 | comment | added | user100410 | He wouldnt have been a better druglord , the evidence was that he was so vulnerable that Amar planned to bring down his place with dynamites and executed it in his presence , he was so devastated to see his own kingdom fall down easily and he did save his people,but lost his place so easily. | |
| May 16, 2023 at 16:16 | comment | added | DavidW | I'm not sure I follow your answer. You say "Sandhanam would have been the drug lord within a small region if not for Rolex" but Sandhanam is a drug lord; do you mean he still would have been a drug lord without Rolex? That does answer the question, but what is the evidence for that? | |
| May 16, 2023 at 12:56 | history | edited | steelersquirrel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
grammar, punctuation
|
| May 16, 2023 at 12:50 | review | Late answers | |||
| May 16, 2023 at 16:16 | |||||
| S May 16, 2023 at 12:27 | review | First answers | |||
| May 16, 2023 at 12:56 | |||||
| S May 16, 2023 at 12:27 | history | answered | user100410 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |