Tag Info

Hot answers tagged

6

Stay out of my territory. I personally believe in this episode SE2EP10 Over, Walt completely embraced his dark side and chose to be Heisenberg rather than a family person. IMDB plot: Walt's cancer has greatly improved. Time to celebrate. Meanwhile Jesse tries to meet his new girlfriend's father. Look at the facts, Walt's health condition is ...


3

The way I took it as that both universes exist side by side (and not subservient to each other) and incidents in one universe affect the other. The causality traffic might seem a bit heavy sided towards Finn's universe being the dominant one, but on closer look you see that this isn't completely true. The Man Upstairs' LEGO policies have certainly shaped ...


2

UPDATED: I lifted this directly off the LOTR Wiki, so I didn't have to go transcribe the DVD Extra: Peter Jackson first encountered The Lord of the Rings via Bakshi's film,[13] and some shots in his live-action trilogy appear to have been influenced by it. One such shot[14] features Frodo and the other hobbits hiding from a Black Rider under a big ...


2

Even though a definite proof -- in form of a confirmation by the Nolans or something similar -- is still missing, I think there is at least enough evidence to conclude that this connection is not coincidental, even if that evidence is only circumstantial. First of all, you are definitely not the only one drawing that connection. There are various articles ...


2

The scene is, according to audio commentary on the DVD, an homage to the Diane Arbus photograph Boy with a Grenade: The usage of this homage is actually another homage, to Stanley Kubrick and, in particular, The Shining. Both stories deal with self-destructive writers, as well as involving scenes of madness and delusion. It can also be argued that the ...


2

I think the first sign was when Walt let Jane die because he wanted Jesse on his team to continue cooking and making money. I don't think Walt was ever in it for anyone but himself. His cancer was the catalyst for his transformation, but he was more than anything, getting revenge against the people he had always felt deep burning hatred for and getting out ...


2

I believe Emmet's movements can be explained in a similar way as in Toy Story. The toys each have an individual personality and autonomy, but those personalities and autonomous actions are affected by the person playing with the toys. This would mean that a large portion of the movie consisted of the characters acting in and of themselves. This makes ...


2

TL;DR: The close up of hands highlighted the amount of personal contact they had with one another and how exhilarating and attractive both Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy found it. Long Answer: Pride and Prejudice took place in the Georgian era and in both it and the following Victoria era, contact between gentleman and ladies would have been much, much more ...


1

I agree that that feels very incomplete, and I think it is an oversimplification of the deeper meanings and metaphorical relationships of their hands, and of the connections that are being made between the characters. Yes, the "hand" is "won" in marriage, but even more deeply rooted to the metaphorical aspect of their hands are the notions of labour, ...


1

Well, if we look at the trail of events, we have: Human's create AI, initially machines serve the humans. One machine goes renegade, killing the human master. For the folly of one machine, humans resort to destroying a whole species of machines. I say species because machines think and feel 'alive' like any other species. Remaining surviving machines are ...



Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible