Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

First of all, the movie was incredibly difficult for me to follow. Contrary to the way Wong Kar wai directed 2046, which was just as confusing in places but always backed up by narration, In The Mood For Love is pure dialogue.

I had to watch it about 10 times before I really followed what was going on and the ending still makes me go, WHAT?


The presidential corps waits at Pochentong Airport. Prince Norodom Sihanouk and Queen Sisowath Kossamak come forward to greet General De Gaulle.

It's ten kilometers from Pochentong to Phnom Penh.

200,000 people line the route.

A welcome unprecedented in the history of the kingdom.

He remembers those vanished years.

As though looking through a dusty window pane, the past is something he could see, but not touch.

And everything he sees is blurred and indistinct.

What's the point of all that historical detail about Cambodia? Is there a point?

share|improve this question

In September 1966, Charles De Gaulle gave a famous speech in Phnom Penh (Cambodia). He expressed France's disapproval of the US involvement in Vietnam (preceding Nixon by 7 years) and he called for a US withdrawal from Vietnam as the only way to ensure peace. So the director MAY be making a political statement about how the war lasted seven years beyond what imperialist France wished.....

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.