Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The ending of 2005 Australian movie The Proposition left me unsatisfied. Arthur Burns takes revenge from Captain Stanley for the death of his brother but doesn't do anything to Eden Fletcher who was the real culprit. In fact Stanley tried to save his brother from flogging that lead to his death. Why would the director create such an unjustified ending ?

share|improve this question
    
Very valid point! +1 –  Mistu4u Dec 28 '12 at 15:44
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

If Captain Stanley hadn't held Mikey (despite believing him innocent) as leverage in order to get Charlie to kill Arthur, then Mikey wouldn't have been in a position to be flogged. Further, Captain Stanley had extorted Charlie to assassinate Arthur, and if it wasn't done by Christmas, Mikey would be hung. That makes three good reasons to kill Stanley - falsely imprisoning Mikey, threatening to kill Mikey, and trying to get Charlie to kill Arthur. Captain Stanley is ultimately responsible for everything that happened after the raid at the beginning of the movie. Besides, Arthur is a sadistic rapist murderer, so we shouldn't expect justice to come from his hands. Justice comes from Charlie, who stops the rape of Martha and kills his own brother Arthur.

Full synopsis of movie

share|improve this answer
1  
Your answer is very good, but I think Arthur wasn't a rapist. It was the other guy with him who sings the song - "O ! Peggy Gordon" in the movie –  Ankit Jan 2 '13 at 9:53
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.