Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Towards the end of the movie Life Of Pi, we are given a new vision of the events depicted in the story. The writer that interviews the main character explains that the Zebra, Orang-Utan, Hyena, and Tiger from the main story represent the Buddhist Sailor, Pi's mother, the Cook, and Pi's dark (murderous) side.
If we assume this logic applies to all the events between the sunk of the ship, and Pi's rescue on Mexico shores; there is an episode left unexplained. This is the part when Pi discovers an island made of floating trees, whose waters dissolve animals at night.

What could represent this event in the alternate vision of the story?
What could be the meaning of this short episode?

It is all the more disturbing since this is the most "hard to believe" part in the first version of Pi's story.

enter image description here

share|improve this question
1  
1  
    
Well folks your story has come to an end. This is because I watched the movie today. Number 1: There was no bones in the raft. Number 2: There is such thing as a floating island but not an alge one. Number 3: The hyena killed the zebra and orangutan. Nimber 4: The tiger then killed the hyena. –  user3955 Jan 24 '13 at 10:29
2  
Here's author Martel's explanation: island served the sole purpose of making the “animal” version of the story harder and harder to believe. “Many readers assume it is something deeply symbolic they just don’t get, or it’s an hallucination –they need a reason to prop up the fiction.” But “religion goes beyond the confines of the reasonable”. from paula-greatstories.blogspot.com/2008/09/… –  Shiz Z. Mar 9 '13 at 17:00
1  
I've added an image of the island to round out this excellent discussion. For what it's worth, even though Martel attaches no significance to the island, I still like the 'it represents his mother' theory the most. –  Nobby Mar 13 '13 at 12:33
show 3 more comments

6 Answers

up vote 12 down vote accepted

OK, assuming the 2nd story is the true one, then we analyze the symbolism in the first story and accept the assignment of the animals to people given by the author/narrator, which concludes with "...and you are the tiger."

We know that Pi (tiger) killed (and possibly ate) the cook (hyena). We also know that Pi coexisted with the tiger, as though Pi and the tiger are not one & the same - demonstrating Pi's inner struggle - peaceful vegetarian vs killer/carnivore/(cannibal). He "needed the tiger in order to survive". But he needed to tame it to keep himself alive.

The island (cook) is teeming with life. The thousands of meercats represent the life-giving flesh of the island. But we see it's shape is that of a sarcophagus, or mummy, or dead man ... the cook. Pi eats the roots and seeds while Richard Parker eats the flesh of the island.

But ultimately, Pi sees that the dark side of this will eventually consume him and he must move on. (perhaps the dark side of the island is the decaying, rotting flesh of the cook.) But before he does, he stuffs himself "til his stomach can hold no more" and gathers as many meercats as he can as "sustenance for Richard Parker".

Pi has eaten the cook.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 nice answer. any chance of adding a screenshot of the shape of the island? that would seal it for me –  Shiz Z. Feb 25 '13 at 22:26
    
I like your interpretation of that part of the movie, and set your answer as accepted. Like Shane, I would like to find a screenshot of that island, but couldn't. –  wil Feb 28 '13 at 2:29
add comment

The shot taken where Pi sees the rotting/dissolving fish in the pond below, it symbolizes an eye..does it mean that Pi sees the rot in the cook's body?

I actually thought that the island looked like a woman. But I need to take a look again. So it's quite possible that Pi eats his own mother in order to survive and then cannot bear it and leaves the island. I think this because, in the end, when he is famished, he has hallucinations where he only sees his mom's face amongst other things and not that of his father or brother.

I haven't read the book. So I might have missed out on some details.

share|improve this answer
add comment

EDIT March 9 2013: Here's author Martel's explanation: island served the sole purpose of making the “animal” version of the story harder and harder to believe.

“Many readers assume it is something deeply symbolic they just don’t get, or it’s an hallucination –they need a reason to prop up the fiction.”

But in his own words “religion goes beyond the confines of the reasonable”.

-http://paula-greatstories.blogspot.com/2008/09/life-of-pi-explained.html

my original answer:
IMHO the island represented how Pi's view of life had changed after he killed the cook:

-according to the insurance guys, there was no such island in reality, suggesting it was a symbol of something, not a real island

-Pi found the island after Richard Parker killed the hyena, which symbolizes Pi killing the cook (and shows that the ordeal at sea had changed Pi forever -- the innocence of his youth was gone)

-initially the island seems like a tranquil paradise but is eventually revealed to be a killer, just like how Pi begins the movie an innocent boy but eventually kills another human being -- and just like how as all of us get older, we inevitably see some of the darker sides of life, and even participate in some of the darkness ourselves

-after finding human teeth in a tree he is sitting in, Pi realizes that the island slowly "digested" someone who tried to stay there before -- symbolizing Pi realizing what will happen if he gets too bogged down in thinking about how he killed the cook (or about other horrors in life)

-then Pi decides that instead of staying on the island (which would represent dwelling on what he did or on life's horrors) he's going to get back on the raft and keep going (which represents moving on with his life)

share|improve this answer
1  
Except that there were bones from a meerkat-type animal in the boat with Pi, weren't there? Haven't seen the movie yet, but the bones were there in the book, which left the reader with an ounce of doubt. –  Mary Jo Finch Dec 22 '12 at 2:27
1  
I can't recall if there were meerkat bones in the boat. But if there were, I would interpret them as reminders of Pi's changed outlook. (I just overhauled my answer, BTW) –  Shiz Z. Dec 23 '12 at 23:57
2  
@Shane I like your suggestion (I also liked when your answer was comparing staying in the island with falling into madness). I don't remember about the meerkat bones but I thought in the book the discovery of the island happened much later after the cook's murder, a long time after Pi has been left starving and thirsty. –  wil Dec 24 '12 at 11:27
1  
[ EDIT] @Shane I like your suggestion (I actually liked it more when your answer was comparing staying in the island with falling into madness). I don't remember about the meerkat bones but I thought in the book the discovery of the island happened much later after the cook's murder, a long time after Pi has been suffering from starvation and thirst. Also eating fruits of the island that itself is supposed to eat humans (fact discovered by Pi when he finds the tooth) seemed afterwards like an act of cannibalism. –  wil Dec 24 '12 at 11:34
1  
You wrote something wrong. Pi found the island just after Richard Parker killed the orangutan. The Tiger doesn't kill the Orangutan, the Hyena does. According to the second story, the Hyena is the cook, and the Orangutan is the narrator's mother. –  Alenanno Jan 7 '13 at 18:55
show 2 more comments

Here is a quote from an interview with Yann Martel, 'Life of Pi' Author (Empasis mine):

[...] The island, ah, the island. The most frequently asked question: What does the island mean? It means what you choose to see in it. My narrative strategy in writting this book was to write a story that was progressively harder to believe. Will you believe that a boy could survive with a tiger? Yes? Good. Will you believe that the boy could go blind, the tiger could go blind and they could meet another blind man in another lifeboat in the middle of the Pacific? Yes? Great. Now will you believe in this crazy carnivorous island? I figure most readers will not believe it. Their suspension of disbelief will break down and readers will start making excuses for Pi: He's starving and hallucinating. In other words, reason will kick in. That's fine with me. But I hope that when readers get to Part Three of the novel and read the other story, the one without animals, that their revulsion at that story will be such that they, like the investigators, will choose the first story as the BETTER story. But I wanted that better story to have something unbelievable about it. I wanted it to get beyond the reasonable and the plausible. BECAUSE every great thing in life — be it religion, love, any ideal — has an element of the unreasonable to it. We are not computers. We need the pull of the unreasonable to get us through life. The island represents that unreasonable element in the first story.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The island, a place for rest and regaining strength for Pi after his lost all his hope (or rationality), has been suggested by some Taiwanese blogger as being a symbol of the difficult moment that he consumed the remaining of his own MOTHER. A few clues suggested this link:

  1. the lotus shaped flower (his mother draw a lotus graph in an early stage of the film)
  2. the shape of the island shot from sea (female body), and
  3. that he tied the hand lace on a tree root when he landed on the island (one act his girl friend did to say goodbye)

In the second story told to the Japanese pari of investigators, Pi said that he dispose his mother in the ocean after she was killed. But do remember that this was just a second version of STORY- it may not be entirely true neither.

So basically the film has three layers of stories.

  1. The first, the surreal 'animal story' that occupied the most of the film
  2. The second, a more brutal 'cook kill sailor and mother' story he told in the end, and
  3. The third, most discreet 'eating his own mother' story only hinted by metaphors.

OF course, Ang Lee deliberately do not tell which is TRUE. This is, after all, a film about story-telling and faith.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I think that the island is a mental state that pi is in. Looking down at his feet he would see bones of his victims in the boat. I think that maybe he realises what he is doing especially when he sees the human tooth. I also think he stays on the raft because of the horrors on the boat ie: drying corpse. He probably ate at night because he couldn't really see what he was doing. He probably had a reality check and decided that he would keep on surviving and not be bogged down in what he couldn't change.

share|improve this answer
add comment

protected by TylerShads Mar 4 '13 at 18:28

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.