Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why is Leia, the twin of Luke, not a Jedi? Is she not supposed to be the "one other" to whom Yoda refers in Star Wars Episode V?

share|improve this question
    
Now that George Lucas says that the saga will continue (and earned some $ with this sell), I think this question we'll be better answered :) –  woliveirajr Nov 16 '12 at 17:45
add comment

4 Answers

She is not a Jedi because she hasn't received any training.

There are hints of her Force powers in the movies.

In The Empire Strikes Back, she senses Luke's distress and has Lando turn around to retrieve him from underneath Cloud City.

Similarly, at the end of The Return of the Jedi, she can tell that Luke made it off the Death Star before it exploded.

In the books that were released later (such as Timothy Zahn's Thrawn Trilogy), it is revealed that Leia has potential for strong Force powers, just like her brother, and has started Jedi training under Luke's instruction.

share|improve this answer
2  
And her powers were stronger along different lines than Luke. Whereas he was strong in the areas of the force that made for a good warrior, her powers ran more along the lines of diplomacy and interpersonal skills –  Kevin Nov 16 '12 at 19:32
    
Thanks to all for the good info! –  Chipmunk Nov 17 '12 at 11:23
add comment

Somewhat of a joke, but somewhat serious; cause Lucas didn't think it all the way through yet.

I always sensed he did Ep IV as a simple movie. Once he saw it was big, then Star Wars went from an action romp to a "deep thinking saga" (TM). Think of all the changes in the re-releases that kind of fit this model. Most famously: Han Shot first. Han goes from a rogue in Ep IV and later has to be ret-conned to a hero, firing in self-defense. I remember hearing that there was some dialog about Luke's dad during the attack on the first Death Star that got removed or muted after the Vader-Luke connection was shown.

Somewhat related, I always wondered why in Ep IV Vader didn't sense her Jedi-ness or daughterness right away.

share|improve this answer
1  
Not a Star Wars nut by any means, but was it ever shown in IV that he even sensed Luke was his off-spring? Far as it was shown in the Prequel trilogy, Ani only knew of one child that Padme was carrying. –  TylerShads Nov 16 '12 at 19:52
    
@TylerShads Also true. I only bring up Leia because he was physically closer to Leia. The best we get for Luke is "The Force is strong in this one" –  Rich Homolka Nov 16 '12 at 19:54
2  
I think whether or not Ep IV was planned as a single movie would make a great question to ask HINT HINT HINT –  TylerShads Nov 16 '12 at 20:11
    
Vader never knew that Padme had actually given birth, until the Emperor told him that Luke was the son of Anakin Skywalker. And he didn't find out that Leia was Luke's twin until Luke let it slip mentally in RotJ. –  KeithS Nov 16 '12 at 20:19
1  
As for Ep IV being planned as a single movie, Lucas had a general timeline for the entire trilogy of trilogies planned out before he wrote the novel and script for Star Wars. That particular piece of the story was picked because it was the best blend of being able to stand as a single movie, and also having sequel potential, giving Fox the most options depending on how it did at the box office. –  KeithS Nov 16 '12 at 20:21
show 1 more comment

Somewhat related to This question over on Sci-Fi SE. The short of it is that Ben Kenobi (and Yoda) were keeping tabs from afar on both Luke and Leia. Luke got the nod for Force training for the sole reason that Leia had been captured, and Ben needed some help getting her out of trouble. Ben, pragmatic as he was, used this serendipitous meeting between himself, Luke, and R2 (carrying a message from Leia) to kick-start the plan he and Yoda had set in motion twenty years earlier.

In addition, think back to Ep IV. Vader had Leia in captivity, and was torturing her personally in her holding cell for some time. He never discovered any latent Force-sensitivity in her. Yet, in the heat of battle, in two separate fighter cockpits separated by several dozen meters of vacuum, Vader could sense in just a few seconds that the Force was strong with the pilot in his crosshairs. That's pretty strong evidence that Luke is in fact the stronger of the two in the ways of the Force. This is borne out in EU sources; Leia trains under Luke in the days of the New Republic, and becomes a Jedi Consular in the New Jedi Order using her Force powers for negotiation and diplomacy. However, she is never a warrior to compare with Luke, or even her own children Jaina, Jacen and Anakin, all three of which become Jedi Knights and one of which falls to the Sith.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Because Leia was a woman... it was made 1977... and George Lucas was born in 1944. He wasn't thinking of the sociopolitical context of the story for the future.

share|improve this answer
    
Hi D.A. : Kind of what I thought, too... –  Chipmunk Nov 17 '12 at 11:18
    
Gene Roddenberry, for comparison, was born in 1921, and Star Trek broke new ground for representations of women and racial minorities. So while I agree with your answer, I don't think Lucas' birth date should get him a pass for being thoughtlessly sexist. –  betherwisser Dec 11 '13 at 0:44
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.