Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

As Captain Miller says to "gear up" after releasing the hostage, one of the sub-ordinates refuses. What I am trying to understand is what the movie was trying to portray in that minute or so when Captain Miller didn't say a word.

The scene shows him as gearing up, is it supposed to be showing Captain Miller's trust in his sub-ordinate to follow orders or is he generally in shock at the current situation.

In the small speech at the end where he says he is a school teacher and does not care who is Ryan, I am thinking the fact that camera does not spend much focus on him that this is how it was to be portrayed; those few minutes of mute were meant to show he didn't care.

Is this the correct thought process for the scene?

share|improve this question

It has to do with the separation of officer and regular soldiers. He does not get involved in this type of situation that is what his sergeant is for (hence mike glances at Tom hanks and then intervenes).

However, hanks is a sensible mature officer and realises that he has to do something to resolve the situation and decides to connect with them and explain why he is doin what he is doing, normally officers have to keep their distance and do not become personal friends with their men as it might compromise the command heirachy and influence the officer's judgement.

This was a big step to take and showed the men that Tom hanks was not immune to the frustration and stresses of the mission, he was sharing it with them and they all needed to work together.

share|improve this answer
up vote 3 down vote accepted

I think I am going with the process that Captain Miller was just thinking a lot, mainly about getting home to his wife and back to his monotonous (but interesting to him) job as a school teacher. Because of this he was not quick to respond to his sub-ordinate actions.

The reasoning I am using to support this is the ending scene where he faces the tank. Logically he knew he stood no chance he stepped in harm's way. This was a decision to finish the mission of keeping Private Ryan alive with the hopes he can either one day go home or fail knowing he doesn't have to carry burden of home sickness anymore.

share|improve this answer

If you recall, there was beginning to be a breakdown in the unit. Some were upset at Miller's decision to let the hostage go, as they wanted to exact revenge for the death of Wade (played by Giovanni Ribisi). Horvath (Tom Sizemore) and Reiben (Edward Burns) had just had a standoff with pistols, Upham (Jeremy Davies) was being called a sympathizer and basically everyone else was yelling at each other. The unity of the troop was breaking down quickly.

In that minute you describe, I think Miller was trying to determine how he was going to survive this mission, and get everyone back on track so he could get back home to his family.

Miller recalled that there was a bet going on about what his pre-war job was. In an effort to diffuse the situation and divert their attention, he offers up his career back home; a school teacher. He begins reminiscing about it and eventually calms the troop down and gets them focused on the task at hand; finding Ryan.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.