Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The recently released Blu-ray edition of Star Wars has a few changes made personally by George Lucas. The most striking is Darth Vader's "No!" in episode VI. Why were these changes made, and do such changes affect viewers' understanding of the plot?

share|improve this question
After watching the linked video, I shouted: Nooooooooooooo! – kapa Dec 1 '11 at 11:09
+1 karthik - I for one will not be buying the blu-rays and I was a big star wars fan. Over the years I've come to realise the movies aren't that great, they're kids movies really. It doesn't help that GL keeps messing with them, perhaps on some level he is trying to fix them, but IMO they cannot be fixed and should be left alone so at least our "rose tinted" memory of them isn't tainted – Antony Scott Dec 11 '11 at 5:13
up vote 17 down vote accepted

I would like to just sum this up as the jumbled effect. Lucas basically wants as much action going on in his movies as humanly possible. Adding attention to items that we already know are there. This can be seen more vividly in Star Wars 1-3 where he adds more characters and objects to the set.

A lot of inference is lost because of this. Instead of asking oneself why an object is on the screen just offset from center, we have the object in plain view center focus, distracting from what is important, establishing the plot and following through with that plot.

  • Ewoks blinking
  • Adding more rocks to where R2 was hiding

Items like these distract the viewer from what is actually going on.

The most controversial change with Darth Vader, changes the emotion and environment of the scene completely.


To who? himself? the emperor? the dark side? to his son dying? Too many questions it was better left mute and let the background music take care of adding in the emotion as well the turning point to that scene, making that scene appear longer than it really is. Now that "no" extends across this entire section, the turning point is now a sharp inflection leading the viewer wanting the scene to be over as quickly as possible.

share|improve this answer
As far as I remember, "noooooo" by darth vader was in the original theatrical release, but Lucas changed the sound to be shorter in the blu ray release.… – Jared Nov 28 '13 at 20:48
@Jared The "no" in question is in Return Of The Jedi, perhaps you're confusing with Revenge Of The Sith. It was not in the ROTJ theatrical release. – Schwern Dec 26 '14 at 1:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.