Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is the ring of triangles around Kermit's neck?

Looking at pictures of frogs, I have been unable to find one that has similar markings. For example, take this picture of a typical frog:

enter image description here

Kermit, of course, has a signature ring of triangles around his neck:

enter image description here

So far I have been unable to find any credible evidence of what that ring is. No interviews with Jim Henson, for example.

One reason given is that ring hides a seam between the puppet's head and body: while this gives a why it is there, especially for a puppet built in the 1950s without modern technology, it does not explain what it is. Another is that Kermit started out as a lizard or nameless animal and later turned into a frog: however, would his appearance not be updated to match his species? Again, this theory does not explain what it is.

This thread on Reddit touches on the various theories and is a good, concise overview: however, it offers no credible evidence to back up any of the claims of what that ring is.

Why does Kermit the Frog have a ring of pointy flaps around his neck?

Note: if you follow the Wikipedia links for Kermit there are some articles that assert he was species-less at first with Henson quotes to back it up: however, upon becoming a frog I would expect his features to match that of a frog as close as one could expect a fictional anthropomorphized muppet to match. His original species is largely irrelevant to his frog features.

share|improve this question
I want to be very clear here: the title is what is around his neck, not why is it there (i.e. to hide the seam in the puppet). – Snowman Feb 26 at 23:02
It always looked like a jester's collar to me. – Walt Feb 26 at 23:04
It appears to be an actual collar, rather than part of his person; – user7812 Feb 26 at 23:26
Why would you expect a Muppet frog to "match [the features] of a frog as close as one could expect"... I suppose you expect to see pigs with luxurious golden hair and hats on bears? Most Muppets have clothes... So does Kermie. – Catija Feb 27 at 0:07
up vote 28 down vote accepted

It's a... Collar. Like a Prince's or Jester's collar. It has nothing to do with being a frog actually, aside that it somehow made him look more frog like. Likely because it gives a nice separation between head and body. Otherwise he just looks like a lizard. Which he used to be.

enter image description hereenter image description here

But to Kermit, it's just a piece of clothes. From the Muppet's Wikia for the Collar.

It's a Very Merry Muppet Christmas Movie cuts in to the end of an interview with Kermit on Last Call with Carson Daly with the frog saying "...and that's why I have this funny collar!"

In The Muppets episode "The Ex-Factor," Piggy tells Kermit he should get a plastic surgeon to tighten up his neck waddle stating "Your pointy jester collar ain't hiding anything."

From another episode, "Crystal Gayle", he says he feels naked when it gets stolen:
enter image description here

Further more:

With the exception of Constantine and various other Kermit impersonators, no other Muppet Frogs sport a pointed collar like Kermit.

From "The Frog Prince" were Kermit first wore his iconic pointed collar. Notice all the other frogs are collar-less. Kermit is the only non-nudist in a nudist colony of frogs it seems: enter image description here

From it's Royal origins of a Frog Prince, it's more like Shakespeare's collar than anything else.

enter image description here

Personally, it inspires images of a lily pad or water lily.

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
The image from episode 402 here might be useful. Episode guide here. – Catija Feb 27 at 0:16
@Catija nice. thanks. – cde Feb 27 at 0:26
Personally, it evokes an image of a lily pad which frogs will sit on. Perhaps that is why it makes him look frog-like despite no real frog having such a thing? – Snowman Feb 27 at 2:00
I think the key piece of evidence here is that it can be "stolen," implying it is not physically part of his body. That provides a very strong argument for your assertion that it is simply a collar. Assuming nobody posts another answer with equal or stronger evidence to back it up, I will accept this answer in a day or two. – Snowman Feb 27 at 2:02
@Snowman Not sure whether that's a good indication since it is also possible to steal the nose of little kids although being a physically part of their body. – scai Feb 27 at 9:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.