Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The name of the British sci-fi movie "Ex Machina", what exactly does it mean? Is there any relationship to the famous game series "Deus Ex"?

share|improve this question
2  
Latin "Deus ex machina" = Eng "god from the machine". At least that's what they taught us in high school. – Mladen Oršolić Feb 10 at 12:36
1  
Deus ex Machina means "God in the works" or simply translated it means divine intervention. In most media it is considered a negative term and refers to an impossible situation being solved by some contrived means. It is considered bad and lazy writing and is often employed to build a ton of drama in a climactic scene and then still get the "happily ever after" ending. The link with most modern media is simply that it sounds cool and doesn't really mean anything so it can be broadly applied. Deus Ex just menas "God in" and Ex Machina means "in the works". Neither means anything literal. – Anton Feb 10 at 15:01
    
No, "Deus Ex" means "God of (or from)...", and "Ex Machina" alone means "From the machine", i.e. "from out of the machine" – DSKekaha Apr 14 at 15:23
up vote 41 down vote accepted

Edited due to many comments providing advice:

Deus Ex Machina doesn't originate from the (rather spectacular) video game Deus Ex.

Modern meaning

Nowadays, it's a simple phrase that exists in the English language and is defined as such:

a character or thing that suddenly enters the story in a novel, play, movie, etc., and solves a problem that had previously seemed impossible to solve

However, a slightly older meaning is:

a god introduced by means of a crane in ancient Greek and Roman drama to decide the final outcome

Latin translation

The slightly older meaning mentioned represents the literal Latin translation of Deus Ex Machina, meaning god from the machine. There is a Wikipedia article describing this in much more detail if you are interested, but in short, an actor playing a god or goddess would be lowered on stage by a "mechane" which was the name of the crane device used.

Typical usage

In modern films, a deus ex machina typically refers to some sort of character or plot device that solves all the issues at the end of a film (e.g. that everything was a hallucination).

Other interpretations follow the typical Greek usage and use the phrase to refer to the introduction or presence of a god or goddess.

Linkage to Deus Ex video game

There is no relationship between the film and the game you describe. Deus Ex is called so because of its relationship to the deus ex machina usage already alluded to.

Ex Machina film usage

If we remove "Deus" from "Ex Machina", this leaves "from the machine" [thanks to @ghostdog for pointing this out].

This quite literally describes Ava. She is from the machine—a creation. This perfectly fits the literal translation of the phrase.

It is also arguable that her creation by Nathan fits the literal "deus" part of "deus ex machina". He is the god, who has created from the machine something that can imitate reality. Whilst @Richard's answers show interviews with the directors of the film suggesting the former is all they were targetting, it's still an interesting interpretation.

Note: Reference to Bustle article has been removed as I felt I was unclear in how it linked into the rest of the answer

share|improve this answer
2  
If Nathan was the "deus" then wouldn't the phrase be "machina ex deus" (or similar)? – stannius Feb 8 at 21:39
3  
@stannius: I'll not even try to get into a Latin discussion :) I just took "deus" as a straight translation of god to cover a possible interpretation of Nathan's role. I agree it's clunky when put together with the whole phrase, which is why I prefer the literal translation. – Andrew Martin Feb 8 at 21:41
1  
There's definitely an argument to be made that the roles, or at least the power dynamic, did flip in the course of the movie. – stannius Feb 8 at 21:48
1  
It's worth mentioning that the "problem" that is being solved is to make a machine that thinks and feels like a human (as said in the movie: "[...] That passes the Turing Test[...]."). You answered perfectly, but you forgot the "essence". The whole thing would be pointless without a goal, right? – Ismael Miguel Feb 9 at 10:31
1  
The OP's question was, what does "ex machina" mean, not what does "Deus ex machina" mean. In this context, "out of the machine" is a better translation than "from the machine". – user30923 Feb 9 at 10:38

Alex Garland spoke to this in an interview with TheFilmStage. The title quite literally means "The Machine" since ... er... that's what it's about, a machine.

TFS: I’ve read quite a few interviews with you about this film but I’ve yet to really see anyone ask you about the title itself. Ex Machina. Taken from Deus Ex Machina, so all it means is The Machine?

AG Yes, precisely. If you take the prefix, the Deus Ex, it implies the god out of the machine.

TFS: I think a title is incredibly important.

AG: I agree, yeah.

TFS: Did you get any pushback on the title?

AG: We did indeed. There were some people that felt the title was a bad idea. It’s not well known. People don’t know how to pronounce it. I really liked this title but I don’t have the power to fight for it that hard. A couple of people involved in the film, with Scott Rudin in particular and one of the financiers, just decided that it was the right thing to do and to support the title. The evidence that was used that finally managed to convince people to go with the title was the movie Prometheus. They figured if they could make Prometheus work, people would buy into Ex Machina. But in truth, if I’m being totally candid, the fact is that this is a really low-budget film and probably they just didn’t care that much.

He also spoke a little about the wider implications in this interview with IO9

We asked Garland if this movie was intentionally about an abusive childhood, and the idea that we’ll raise A.I.s the same way we raise human children, abusively. “That’s a really complicated question, and it’s got a complicated answer,” said Garland.

“Basically—if I can go back a step—you might know that Ex Machina comes from a larger phrase, which was “deus ex machina,” and the deus bit of that is God. And this title drops ‘God’ out of it. And some of my thinking ran along the lines of this... We typically present creation stories as cautionary tales, saying ‘Man should not meddle in God’s work. And I wasn’t interested in the ‘God’ part of it. So hence taking ‘God’ out of the title.”

share|improve this answer
1  
+1: That's a really interesting interview. – Andrew Martin Feb 8 at 20:37
1  
Leave it to the author to invalidate the internet's wild mass guessing. I wonder if he just wanted to call it Machina but couldn't because it would be too similar to Automata which out a year earlier. – Lilienthal Feb 8 at 21:04
1  
@Lilienthal - Ain't it a shame when someone comes along with an actual answer :-P – user7812 Feb 8 at 21:05
4  
@Richard It's even more of a shame when the actual answer is wrong. "Ex machina" does not mean "the machine": it means "from [or out of] the machine". (I'm not sure if Alex Garland really thinks it means "the machine" or if he was just slightly confused by the question and accidentally agreed with the interviewer that it means something it doesn't mean.) – David Richerby Feb 9 at 6:22
    
@DavidRicherby: I think too many of us are focussing on the exact literal, Latin translation. If "deus ex machina" is "god from the machine" and deus is "god", it's not a leap to say "ex machine" is from the machine, or machine. It's not entirely correct from a grammatical perspective, but you can see what the director is aiming for. – Andrew Martin Feb 9 at 8:03

The relationship between Ex Machina and Deus Ex is that both are based on the same original phrase: Deus ex machina. The phrase had a specific meaning related to plays, however both the artworks in question are using its literal translation: God from the machine.

Deus Ex, the video game series, has protagonists who undergo progressive cyborg augmentation. They gain god-like powers by adding machines to their bodies. The title leaves off the "Machine" but it's still there and implied.

Ex Machina, the movie, leaves out the Deus part of the phrase. I would argue that it's left ambiguous at the end just what emerged from the machine that is the main female character. God? Devil? Nothing more than a program executing its instructions? It could also be a play on the english meaing of "ex": formerly a machine, but no longer.

share|improve this answer
3  
+1. This seems to me the most intuitive interpretation of the phrase as it relates to this movie and as it's used in modern scifi. – Lilienthal Feb 8 at 19:57

Deus ex machina is a very old theatrical plot device, where the characters of gods would be brought on stage to develop the plot. It came to mean any 'outside influence' on the plot structure, which could not have been performed by the characters themselves.

Its literal meaning "God from the machine" has been reinterpreted over recent years, as the plot device is now almost too well-known to really use any more.

I think the movie's use of it assumes the audience to already be familiar with the concept, thereby allowing them to push one step further & just use "from the machine" to describe Ava's 'potential' as a human, rather than machine - as the entire plot device for Ava's sentience is Nathan's Turing test on successive Avas.
Caleb's character is the device by which we discover this.

share|improve this answer
7  
Too well-known to really use anymore? Please inform Hollywood. – John O Feb 8 at 17:34
1  
In my mind "deus ex machina" also has the sub-meaning of "the author is being lazy" in the sense that rather than properly developing the plot the author is using a "...and now a miracle occurs" plot device where all problems are solved, everything turns out for the best, etc, blah. – Bob Jarvis Feb 10 at 13:59
    
Film examples of this is Deep Impact, Armageddon and The Core. The world is on the brink of disaster, and some person or agency just happens to have the exact tools or knowledge to fix it all. Deep Impact and Armageddon just happened to have the special shuttles available for the job, and The Core just happened to have a crazy "lone genius" with all the up to that point unknown inventions. Those three are by no means the only films using this literary cop out. – A.Grandt Feb 10 at 18:27

Ex machina is a Latin phrase which can be translated as "from the machine" or "by reason of the machine". If one starts from the second translation then "deus ex machina" can be taken to mean "god by reason of the machine".

share|improve this answer

Hmmm. Well, at the end of the movie it shows her in a city, as if to become part of society. It would be assumed that she will try to pass herself off as human. "Ex" means "used to be", or "formerly", as in ex-wife. She is now, at least socially, an ex-machine. So for me, "Ex-Machina" was the punch-line at the end of the movie; "Oh, That's what it means!"

share|improve this answer
    
A very interesting idea! – eYe Feb 8 at 16:50
1  
You mean "formerly" not "formally". – Chenmunka Feb 8 at 18:14
    
After reading all the definitions and considering one of the meanings of "Ex Machina" is "out of the machine", your theory might well be the answer in context of the movie. – eYe Feb 10 at 13:38

In Greek "Deus ex machina" would translate as "O από μηχανής Θεός", which is a term originating for ancient Greek dramatic poetry and especially from tragedy.

It meant that a God would be making his appearance before mortals, usually happening at the end of a play thus helping the writer ending his play, by providing a solution or resolving a rather difficult and dead-end situation

There are more than one theories why the term came to be:

1) An actor playing a God, would be lowered into the theater scene with the help of a wooden crane, it would appear as he was descending from the heavens.

2) Greeks Gods would descend to earth on flying chariots and they where trying to replicate this effect so the spectators could interpret the divine intervention.

share|improve this answer

protected by Ankit Sharma Feb 10 at 12:44

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.