Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm a big fan of the Pink Panther movies (the ones with Peter Sellers, not new ones with Steve Martin). But after watching The Life and Death of Peter Sellers, I'm left with the impression that the original The Pink Panther was intended to be a serious film, but Peter Sellers essentially tried to sabotage the production out of spite, turning it into a comedy, and subsequently turning it into the classic hit it became. The sequels all have much more of a comedy feel, which would be consistent with this sequence of events.

But how accurate was the portrayal of these events in The Life and Death of Peter Sellers? Can I read more about the dynamics that took place during the creation of the original movie and the sequel?

share|improve this question
1  
Interesting. I've always felt that the original Pink Panther seemed like a serious movie with comedic elements added to it. Never knew about this documentary. –  System Down Nov 30 '11 at 19:55
    
It's not a documentary, it's a biopic. Pretty interesting, though as with all films of this genre it's probably laden with "artistic liberties". –  Johnny Bones Mar 7 at 11:53
add comment

4 Answers 4

up vote 17 down vote accepted

From NNDB:

Edwards' most famous work, The Pink Panther, was released in 1963, with Peter Sellers as Inspector Jacques Clouseau. The part had originally been cast with Peter Ustinov, but that actor reneged at the last minute, and Sellers stepped in, with his suggestion that the character be "bumbling", which, of course, changed not just the character, but the nature of film comedy.

And from a Review by Clarenc Beaks:

The Pink Panther (1963) began life as a star-studded caper comedy intended to be anchored by David Niven as the debonair jewel thief Sir Charles Lytton, aka "The Phantom," a man audacious enough to carry on an affair with the wife of his tireless, if thoroughly inept, pursuer, Inspector Jacques Clouseau. And had Peter Ustinov, originally cast as Clouseau (and, coincidentally, batman to the higher-ranking Niven in World War II), not backed out of the production, following Ava Gardner's lead (who had been cast as Clouseau's philandering spouse), it's entirely possible that there would have been no Pink Panther franchise (though a great thespian, Ustinov was hardly anyone's idea of an explosive comedic talent). But when Peter Sellers came on board as the incompetent inspector, the picture was suddenly given a raucously funny performer who easily could run away with the proceedings.

So it seems it was intended to be a comedy from the beginning, but quite a different style of comedy than what it became once Sellers got involved.

share|improve this answer
    
That I can easily believe. Ustinov did often take 'light comedy' type parts - he even played Poirot with a bit of a comic edge - but I would agree that he's no 'explosive comic talent'. –  iandotkelly Dec 2 '11 at 14:16
add comment

I do recall the first Pink Panther movie being less slapstick in its approach, a more subtle performance from the cast - but I would find it hard to believe that they set out to make a serious movie and ended up with a comedy.

No matter how big the star, I simply don't believe they would let someone completely revise the genre of a movie like that. Peter Sellers was almost exclusively known as a comedic actor, in both Radio and Movies, it was very much the exception when he played serious parts. His write up on IMDB starts "Often credited as the greatest comedian of all time".

I have no evidence, but I just don't find it credible.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Yes, I saw documentaries with Blake Edwards and he knows lot about comedy and visual gags. I'm sure he knew he was doing a comedy.

The spanish documentary "Y usted ... ¿de que se ríe?" contains an interview with Blake Edwards about comedy.

share|improve this answer
2  
Blake Edwards also did many classic serious films. The most famous probably being Breakfast at Tiffany's. Most of the scenes in the original PP that don't include Peter Sellers feel a lot more like something out of Tiffany's than they feel like something out of the rest of the PP series. –  Flimzy Nov 30 '11 at 19:53
    
Flimzy, Did you know Breakfast at Tiffany's have a homage to the Marx's Brothers stateroom gag? –  Zhen Dec 1 '11 at 8:41
    
Do any of these documentaries actually discuss the original PP movie, though? –  Flimzy Dec 1 '11 at 19:54
add comment

In deciding whether the film was originally planned as a comedy you might look, for instance at the names of the Director, the screenwriter, and the cast.

How many films did Peter Sellers make which were not comedies, for instance? His entire reputation was in comedy, from the time of his earliest beginnings in radio with 'The Goon Show'.

Blake Edwards was not known for making Shakespearean drama, nor even for making contemporary drama. He was not Irwin Allen, who directed 'Towering Inferno' and 'The Poseidon Adventure'. Nor was he Cecil B DeMille.

It is a mistake to suppose that the lead actor, Sellers, can re-write the screenplay. Only the director of the film can do that; and if the actors wish to make changes, this cannot be done without the agreement and support of the director.

Sellers had the ability to make a humorous screenplay funnier in performance than it might appear on the written page; but unless the director was making a comedy, Sellers had no chance of getting laughs, if that was not Edwards' intention.

Then again, why hire Sellers at all, unless you were making a comedy?

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.