Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

As described on IMDB site, the Akira remake:

Set in New-Manhattan a city rebuilt with Japanese money, the story focuses on two biker friends. Further plot is not known at this time.

My issue is not with non-asian actors (but I kid you not if Robert Patterson takes one of the roles for this movie I will be disappointed in Hollywood, Even though I already am), my issue is with the reason why Akira worked. It worked (for me) because I liked the Tokyo setting

  • Post war experiences
  • Post atomic bomb experiences
  • Overpopulation
  • Daily economic struggle

These items can be seen in a few old anime movies

Now it is being moved to New York of which if anything that this will be relatable to would be 9/11 or an alternate reality where the crime rate reaches uncontrollable levels like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_from_New_York. The dystopia for New York just doesn't really seem to fit the bill. Which by all means is not a problem, so why not change the name from Akira?

I've seen in the past how Hollywood takes something and turns it into nothing, but that's okay, the goal is to make money. I just want to know why and how are they going to spin Akira, a movie that dictates anime direction for all anime of the past decade to a location where dubbed movies are favored over subtitles. Even taking into account that North America is english speaking, it still does not explain the need to change location. The point was to show the culture within Tokyo and how crappy it can be for the characters.

So could someone please tell me how will this work for a place like New York.

share|improve this question
1  
Uhoh, there will be an Akira-remake? Hmm, possibly it will be a good movie (especially after so much time), but my experience let me be skeptic about it. –  Mnementh Dec 1 '11 at 20:54
    
Fist of the North Star anyone? –  xiaohouzi79 Dec 22 '11 at 5:55
    
Thank goodness this remake attempt failed. –  user209 Jan 20 '12 at 5:08
    
"It worked because of the fact it was in Tokyo." I don't quite follow? Because it was made in Japan? Lots of Japanese films are set outside of Japan. Because it's set in Japan? Many dystopic films are set outside of Japan? Because it had a Japanese cast/crew? Same answer. Because it was a "Japanese" story? Well, it wasn't. –  Jamie Taylor Jun 21 '12 at 16:00
    
@JamieTaylor I liked the Tokyo setting, no need to get all semantic and worked up :/ –  phwd Jun 21 '12 at 16:04

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

The usual answer Hollywood offers when they do this sort of thing is that they want the audience to connect to the story. Since they are probably aiming for the largest possible audience (more money!) they will go for (what they perceive to be) the lowest common denominator. Thus Americanizing the story, to almost beyond recognition. They believe that (to most Americans) New York is far more familiar than Tokyo as a possible dystopic city. The differences between the two cities is perceived by Hollywood to be beyond the common movie goer.

share|improve this answer
    
Hmm I could see that for a city not situated on a island nation. If a nuclear explosion were to happen in New York it would affect the surrounding areas of the U.S. Now who is going to intervene in battles in the US? The UN? sounds weird doesn't it? The plot itself would have to be changed. –  phwd Dec 1 '11 at 0:56
    
@Alonzo: Wouldn't be the first time Hollywood threw logic to the wind, especially when it comes to action blockbusters, which is almost certainly what they want to spin Akira as. –  System Down Dec 1 '11 at 1:04

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.