Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

At the near end of the movie, when a box delivered to the trio in a deserted place is opened, David Mills' (played by Brad Pitt) wife Tracy Mill's face appears for a fraction of a second.

Wikipedia's plot summary of the movie suggests that his wife was murdered.

Doe claims to represent the sin of "Envy"; he was jealous of Mills' normal life, and killed Tracy after failing to "play husband" with her.

But the viewers don't have first hand account of whether the murder actually took place.

Is it possible that John Doe (played by Kevin Spacey) didn't actually kill his wife? If he really did, how can the viewer be sure of the murder other than the subliminal appearance of Tracy Mill's face when the box was opened and John Doe's account to David Mills?

share|improve this question
4  
So apart from the fact that John Doe had murdered 5 other people in a grisly and symbolic manner, and the brief glimpse of the head, David Mills murderous reaction, and zero evidence to the contrary. Wow, you could doubt pretty much any plot point in any movie on this basis. –  iandotkelly Jun 28 '12 at 13:20
    
Well you can happily delete this question if you think it is absurd. –  jokerdino Jun 28 '12 at 13:23
    
Well I tend to only close questions that are clearly off-topic. If people think its absurd or good can vote on it. –  iandotkelly Jun 28 '12 at 13:26
    
mill's wife dead and what character she supposed to be? –  user4076 Feb 7 '13 at 15:54

3 Answers 3

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Given the "credibility" of the Kevin Spacey character (he hadn't failed to follow through...ever) I would think he can't possibly be "faking" his climax.

share|improve this answer

It is possible, it could have been a fake head in the box etc. However, going on Mills's character I think it is more likely he actually killed her and sent the severed head.

share|improve this answer

The context and the character of the participants makes it very clear

Note, as far as I recall the viewer never gets a glimpse inside the box, so, in one sense, the movie deliberately withholds evidence from the viewer. This might leave you doubting that Jon Doe had murdered Mills' wife.

But the context of the scene does not. We know the characters of the individuals: John Doe is clearly capable and motivated to commit the murder and, to make his epic point, he has to commit an act capable of inciting Mills to the sin of Wrath; Somerset has a deep understanding of human motivation and the specific patter of Doe's crimes; Mills is in love with his wife and is not such a poorly controlled cop that he would react with vengeful wrath to many insults.

The scene plays out with Somerset opening the box. Somerset's reaction to seeing the contents suggests he knows immediately what Mills will do. He attempts to stop Mills obvious action by persuading him to disarm before looking in the box. What other possible content in the box could cause this reaction? Mills then looks and reacts with vengeance. What else could have persuaded him to do so? Mills has seen other atrocities committed by Doe and did not react this way.

The only possibility here is that Doe has done what he claimed and the box contains Mills' wife's head. The fact it is not shown explicitly actually makes the climax more tense. You don't need to see everything to know what has happened (subtlety is good and treats audiences as intelligent people).

share|improve this answer

protected by Ankit Sharma Feb 7 '13 at 16:41

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.