Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Near the end of Blade Runner, Deckard enters Sebastian’s apartment, gets ambushed and kills the girl. He then gets chased around the apartment by Roy, who leads Deckard to believe that he is going to kill him. At the end of the chase Roy saves Deckard from falling off the building, then gives his speech and dies.

My question is, why did Roy let Deckard live? He had every opportunity to kill him, and plenty of motivation, but in the end he chose not to. Why?

share|improve this question
Also on Science Fiction SE. – unor Aug 21 '13 at 22:46

One of the main themes of the movie is the question, what makes us human and especially, if the replicants in their desperate struggle for survival are in the end not more human than the cold blooded killing Blade Runner. In this way this scene may be interpreted as Roy showing a humanitiy, Deckard would have probably not shown to him.

And I also think Roy actually already saw his end coming at this point. So he just let matters rest and helped him, to tell him his last words, since he had not to fear him anymore. He was only fighting for his own survival and showed his humanity when laying down his sword once this obstacle didn't stand between them anymore.

share|improve this answer

Roy and the other replicant have been engaged in a desperate struggle to live, and Roy has been running most of the show. The struggle was Roys and though it has been carried out on the cerebral level where he is the most able (i.e. get to Earth, find Tyrel, get access, force him to provide a fix...) it has been a desperate time nonetheless.

When he finds Pris dead, Roy is understandable angry and he starts by trying to make Deckard live the fear and desperation, but in the course of watching (and causing) Deckard's struggles he begins to empathize with the man who came after him.

On top of all that, Roy's end is coming. His body is breaking down during the same time as Deckard fights to stay ahead of him, Roy's final speech gives us a clue: he wants someone to remember that he lived and some pale shadow of what he saw.

Empathy and legacy come together and Deckard gets his reprieve.

share|improve this answer

atleast someone recognise that he was trying to be a mere human trying to survive

Roy and the other replicants have not been shown to be a 'violent' variety. It is only when they realise the impending doom carried by their bodies that they become * rebellious* and decide to gain life at any cost. When Roy learns from his maker that there is possibly no cure, he kills him in his rage. As he is being chased by Deckard, Roy's impulse is to survive and defend himself from being terminated. However, after losing his alies, Roy comes to a realization and understanding of the inevitability of his death. It is because of this, that Roy wishes to die like humans and not like a machine being put out of work. Knowing of his fast approaching death, regardless of whatever he does, Roy decides that atleast someone recognise him in his dying hours that he too was trying to be a mere human trying to survive. It is for this reason he chose to say those words to Deckard and let him live. Or rather, refused to kill him by his own choise.

share|improve this answer

This is a difficult philosophical question.

We, the audience, are asked to judge Roy's motivations from observing his actions. And the fact that there are so many differing versions of this movie makes this a somewhat more than usually difficult thing to do.

Nevertheless, my opinion is that Roy, and the other replicants, long to be human. It seems to me that Ridley Scott is telling us that they are not merely struggling to gain more life, but are actually seeking a way to become fully human; something which, of course, includes a longer lifespan.

My take on Roy is that in saving Deckard's life he is demonstrating to the audience that he is psychologically already human, in that he is acting in the way a human would act.

Whether Deckard, who in one edit subsequently kills Roy, is morally justified in doing so - since he owes Roy a debt for saving his life - is a different question. Subtly, Ridley Scott is implying here that Deckard is less human than Roy, to support the theme Scott is fostering that Deckard is actually a replicant.

Thus, Roy lets Deckard live in order to demonstrate that Roy is thinking and behaving like a human; and, in addition, to contrast this with Deckard then killing Roy, thereby showing himself to be less human than Roy.

share|improve this answer
Are you sure that there is a version where Deckard kills Roy before he can tell his last words and "shuts down", which version would that be (maybe you're right, don't know exactly, but I really doubt it)? Otherwise good answer (in fact along the lines of the existing answers, but those are in the end all pretty similar), +1. – Napoleon Wilson Dec 12 '12 at 13:07

To mess with him, so the man that was hunting replicants can owe his life to one, and then to give him a little speech about the bitterness of death.

Roy was pretty boss all in all

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.