Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Apocalypse Now ends with Col. Kurtz's words "The Horror, the horror". Capt. Willard is also seen saying during the end of the movie

They will make me Major after this but I am not even in their Army anymore

These things and the overall tone of the movie suggests that it is an anti-war film. Wikipedia mentions a Marine named Anthony Swofford recounted how his platoon watched Apocalypse Now before being sent to Iraq in 1990 in order to get excited for war. Similar stuff is shown in the movie Jarhead.

Is Apocalypse Now, an anti-War film or a pro-War film?

share|improve this question
Does it have to be one or the other? – Andrew Martin Aug 13 '14 at 11:26
They showed us the war scenes of "Forrest Gump" in basic military training. JUST the war scenes where he saves Lieutenant Dan by carrying him out of the jungle. (The movie was new then, hadn't shown here, and it was probably an illegal copy.) Just cut it right and you can make a pro-war propaganda movie from every war movie. – his Aug 13 '14 at 11:52
Related: – Napoleon Wilson Aug 13 '14 at 12:12
up vote 5 down vote accepted

This is going to be subjective at best, because (as you've pointed out) any movie can be interpreted any number of ways in order to facilitate a certain goal.

Fahrenheit 9-11 features an interview with a serving US Soldier who states that, in homage to the film, their tank division plays loud music at the enemy as a way of intimidating them. The song he claims most effective is Drowning Pool's The Roof is on Fire: but it's impossible to prove from this that Drowning Pool in any way intended for their music to be 'pro-war', its all about context and how the text is dispensed. The song used in this video is the Bloodhound Gang Cover...

It's true that the 'Charlie don't surf' sequence is frequently cited as a emotionally-inciting sequence by service personnel, largely due to its depiction of unopposed, effective military aggression:

Depending on whether you'd rather hear the intention of the movie, director Francis Ford Coppola is fairly certain he has made a politically neutral film in this respect:

"I feel any artist making a film about war by necessity will make an 'anti-war' film and all war films are usually that. My film is more of an 'anti-lie' film, in that the fact that a culture can lie about what's really going on in warfare - that people are being brutalised, tortured, maimed and killed - and somehow present this as moral is what horrifies me, and perpetuates the possibility of war."

Whilst Coppola won't go as far as to claim he has made an anti-war film, his sentiment towards 'the horror' of war (both within the narrative and in the quote above) suggest that, as an artist, his disposition is inherently against war. Whether we feel that this is being communicated through the text, and if it is how successful or persuasive we find it, is a matter of personal opinion.

share|improve this answer
Interesting that Coppola's attitude that it's impossible to make a pro-war movie seems to be exactly the opposite of Truffaut's attitude. Hard to say though, what this in turn says about both their respective attitudes towards war (or to their audience's supposed attitude towards war) in general. – Napoleon Wilson Aug 14 '14 at 12:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.