Sign up ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Titanic, the elderly Rose visits a ship searching for the Heart of the Ocean diamond, set in a necklace. Unbeknownst to them, she actually carries it with her.

In one of the final scenes, a bare footed Rose walks to the railing of the search ship, climbs up on it in similar fashion to when she and Jack were on the prow of the Titanic, and throws it into the ocean.

The accepted answer in Why did Lovett invite Rose aboard his search boat in Titanic? suggests Rose threw it overboard for 'closure', but I simply cannot understand how that was closure. After all, it is not as though Jack (when alive) had any real interest in it. Nor did Rose. It was of interest only to her fiance Cal (who took his own life in 1929, when the stock market crashed).

It could be said that the return of the 'Heart of the Ocean' to the ocean, was ..poetic in a sense, but how was it closure? If not closure, then why did she do it?


Interestingly, the original script differs from the movie in that the people searching for the diamond are there to witness her throwing it overboard. She even has a few words with Lovett as he is holding the object of his desire in his hand.

You look for treasure in the wrong place, Mr. Lovett. Only life is precious, and making each day count.

Another snatch of the script that might be relevant:

The hardest part of being so poor, was being so rich. But every time I thought of selling it, I thought of Cal. And somehow I always got by without his help.

share|improve this question
You can't put a price on love. – Chloe Jun 30 '14 at 3:45
Perhaps she threw it back to give Lovett a chance to find it on his own. – Diane Nov 1 at 23:23

1 Answer 1

up vote 12 down vote accepted

I always looked at it as Rose giving her heart to Jack, symbolically. Also, she knew the value of it and knew that in an extreme moment of poverty she could sell it, but she was now at the end of her life and knew she no longer needed that "chip" to cash in. Also, recall that it was somewhat "stolen", so passing it on to her heirs would come with some risk she probably wasn't willing to impart on them.

share|improve this answer
"Giving her heart to Jack, symbolically" makes sense but pardon me for being a romantic, thinking that Rose somehow gave a damn about the value of the necklace to use in a jam strikes me as horribly cynical. Perhaps thats why that part of the script didnt make the cut. – nameEqualsPNamePrubeGoldberg Sep 30 at 2:47
I think you're looking at her life backwards. She had the chip to cash in, but that always made her think of Cal. When she realized she was near the end and no longer needed it, she knew she had to give it to Jack. Or, at least that was always my impression. – Johnny Bones Sep 30 at 13:15

protected by Community Nov 2 at 6:39

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.