Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A recent trend that I've noticed (or I'm just crazy and need to delete this question) is to release a major film outside of the U.S. first, even if it's a Hollywood film. Usually a week or so later the film gets released in the U.S.

Why are movies being released this way?

share|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

In some cases the original delay involved the time required for licensing (music), appropriate copyrights, ratings, and in some cases the redubbing of the film into other languages. The latter of which can not typically begin until the final edit is determined. In some major films (especially action films) the final edit may not be complete until the film initially releases.

As film companies see better returns internationally, they try to shorten this process or build it in for a world-wide release.

In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons. One can be to build US expectation; to assess general reaction before domestic release in the event the film needs to be reedited, or in some cases the delays above (such as rating or licensing) may cause a delay.

share|improve this answer

I have not seen many examples of Hollywood movies shown first in the rest of the world before the USA, but it is certainly the case that simultaneous release around the world is now normal when it used to be rare. If the trend has continued beyond 'simultaneous' to now opening in the rest of the world first, it is probably for the same reason.

There are several factors affecting this, for instance with digital technology, it is becoming easier and quicker to distribute movies. However the main reason I think is preventing piracy cutting into profits.

It used to be that Hollywood movies would be released weeks or even months before release in the rest of the world. I think this partially came down to hitting the biggest market first and building a reputation before going abroad, but it also used to be very hard to pirate a movie. You would have often to film a movie in a theater, and the quality would be normally pretty bad.

Nowadays, with vastly better technology, it is far easier and cheaper for high quality copies of movies to be made and quickly distributed worldwide. Studio's have to hit the worldwide market much faster to prevent pirated copies of the movie diluting their profits, especially around the world.

share|improve this answer… is an example of a big movie seen outside the US first, though I'm struggling to connect this with your piracy theory. – hexparrot May 2 '12 at 18:06
@hexparrot - thanks for the example. The argument is that if a movie appears in one territory, particularly the USA weeks before it appears in other territories with perhaps lower enforcement of copyright laws - that (enough) people will resort to watching pirated copies and not wait and pay to see the movie in the theatre. By enough - I mean enough that the studio is bothered about the reduced revenue. I wish I could find a reference, but I have heard this discussed on a movie review radio show. – iandotkelly May 2 '12 at 19:29

My understanding is that the US, being a huge market and often at least a third of the film's worldwide revenue, can be used to push up if hype is a factor.

With the Avengers, if they know in advance it's going to be a success - and franchises tend to do well worldwide - especially superhero ones, releasing internationally only intensifies the hype back in the US (and Canada, I should point out, having just moved here from New Zealand, I'm gutted that I have to wait longer than my Kiwi friends who have all seen it). A week later, everyone in the US (and Canada) goes to see it.

It's just a theory, but I suspect the actual marketing plan involved is just a theory anyway.

A youtube blogger suggest that THIS is the reason for it...that by releasing it worldwide, it helps to combat the threat of worldwide piracy that happens when movies are released first in the US. However, one would think that since worldwide sales tend to be 2/3 of big blockbuster sales, the opportunity for piracy increases immediately and those with fast internet connections in the US could just download it, negating that effect.

share|improve this answer
could you provide a synopsis of what's in the youtube video? – DForck42 May 3 '12 at 16:09
added and updated – Mark Mayo May 3 '12 at 19:28

According to this article, it has a lot to do with how the market in other countries is becoming a bigger factor these days, movies can make more money in other countries than in the US if it's good enough. From other things I've read it also has to do with piracy, people in America pirating a theatrical release, then distributing it on the internet for the world to see, granted that's kinda reversed now as I see a lot of pirated films from other countries, so not sure why that would really matter.

Not long ago, homegrown Hollywood "event movies" like these would have opened in America first, then abroad. Or they would have opened everywhere in the world on the same day, a measure that not only created worldwide hype for the films but also thwarted pirates who might have taken advantage of the release-date gap to flood a country's streets with bootleg DVDs from another country where the movie had already opened. So what changed? Why does Hollywood now make America wait to see its own movies until after they've premiered throughout the rest of the world?

More than anything else, the shift reflects how the international market, once just gravy for Hollywood, has eclipsed the domestic market as the main source of revenue for mainstream theatrical releases. As big as last year's "The Avengers" was at home ($623.4 million), it was even bigger abroad ($888.4 million). Of that foreign total, $185.1 million came in on the film's overseas opening weekend, which took place a week before the movie premiered here. So it's no wonder that Disney would repeat the strategy for "Iron Man 3."

share|improve this answer

Some Hollywood movies have to be released in the United Kingdom first, then the rest of Europe, then worldwide, until it reaches to the United States. Well, it's because many Hollywood movie studios are cutting production costs in the US...since it gives PROFIT.

share|improve this answer
I fail to see the correlation of releasing to UK first with cutting production costs. – TylerShads Jun 11 '12 at 12:27
Can you tell us how doing it this way reduces production costs and increases profit? This doesn't really make a lot of sense. – DForck42 Jun 11 '12 at 13:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.