Sign up ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Non-Stop we saw that the copilot was killed from a dart like thing shot from a hole in the toilet wall. But who killed him and how did he get killed?

share|improve this question
Well, it was most likely one of the two terrorists revealed at the end. And how? Like you said with some kind of poisoned dart, likely shot from a little blowgun kind of thing. –  Napoleon Wilson May 30 '14 at 10:25
Yeah but they were not in toilet. The old lady and Jen were the only one to go to toilet. –  Anirban Nag 'tintinmj' May 30 '14 at 10:51
Hmm, true. Well, maybe that's just one of the smaller inconsistencies this nevetheless great movie had in its overall plot. But I'd be happy to hear an actual answer for this. –  Napoleon Wilson May 30 '14 at 10:54
@tintinmj (quote: The old lady and Jen were the only ones to go to the toilet.) Is that really true? It's only what Neeson's Marks can confirm given second-hand information. The old woman said she saw the stewardess Jen go into the toilet, but shortly after that either terrorist could have gone in. All anyone would need is a second, and given Marks was shown opening locked toilets with a simple instrument (pen?) there's no reason a terrorist couldn't have done it just as easily. –  rbsite May 30 '14 at 12:33
It was the pilot being shot. I think the whole point of the hole in the toilet wall was to make Jen a suspect and add tension to the story. Strange thing is that the other guy dying from the same poisson did die after 10 minutes, which suggests that the pilot also was shot 10 minutes before. Which might make Jen a suspect again (or the old lady), would be a plot twist of a plot twist if the terrorist were working for her :P –  invalid_id Jul 11 '14 at 11:35

1 Answer 1

The only explanation besides it being a hole in the movie, is that the poison darts have a very long delay time (20-25 minutes). This opens a large gap of time where the ex soldier could have used the toilet before the old lady, and shot the pilot. The movie doesn't show who uses the toilet before the old lady, just after to make Jen a suspect. There ya go:) Oh and on a side note, as a veteran, I find this movie to be very disrespectful to have a veteran be associated with an act of terrorism... Very disappointed...

share|improve this answer
"I find this movie to be very disrespectful to have a veteran be associated with an act of terrorism" - Well, no offense, but veterans, like any other humans, can be evil (or rather misguided), too. I wonder if we're not allowed to portray them as the villains out of some false understanding of respect or if accountants would find the movie disrespectful had the terrorists been accountants. But otherwise interesting answer. –  Napoleon Wilson Jul 22 '14 at 8:27
Yea, it's not like Veterans have ever been involved in terrorism... Tim McVeigh. That said, I totally respect anyone in the armed forces, but they are not all good - just like @NapoleonWilson said. Bad apples in every field... edit: Wow, had no idea I just responded to such an old post. Oh well. –  JPhi1618 Sep 15 at 18:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.