Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In the 2014 TV adaptation of the 1996 movie "Fargo" by the Coen Brothers, one of the main characters, the female police officer Molly Solverson, is investigating a strange series of crimes happening in a small town in Minnesota.

While the TV show deviates from the movie in many ways, both in plot and characters, the character of Molly is clearly an adaptation of Marge Gunderson from the movie. They both are female cops, clever investigators and very friendly. Both are the ones driving the investigation.

There are some major differences though, and one of them strikes me the most:

While Marge from the movie is pregnant and in an unexciting but content marriage with her husband Norm, Molly from the TV show is Single.

Marge and her husband Norm Marge and Norm having exciting breakfast!

Seeing that the simple, traditional life that Marge leads in the movie is (at least in my interpretation) a major point of the movie because it contrasts the greed and discontent of Jerry Lundegaard, the car salesman who set the crimes in motion, I wonder why it was completely changed in the TV show.

What is the reason for the producers of the TV show changing Marge/Molly's background this drastically?

Did they maybe want to set a different focus/morale in the show? Was the personal life of Marge simply too boring for a long running TV show? Did they simply change it to make the character their own?

share|improve this question
The TV series is a sequel (19 years later?), not an adaptation. Like many sequels it repeats and even expands some of the same themes. and the producers are the same. – RBarryYoung Jun 16 '14 at 21:37

Vulture's Matt Zoller Seitz talks about the "same/different" vibe that permeates the show in his review of the pilot episode:

You could look for one-to-one correlations between the movie and the show, but as soon as you find one that feels close, series creator Noah Hawley severs the connection. The pregnant officer played by Frances McDormand at first seems to have been split into two characters, a sheriff played by Bob Odenkirk, and his deputy, a gung-ho patrol woman (Allison Tolman, one of the best out-of-nowhere acting finds in my lifetime as a critic), but by the end of the pilot you realize, delightedly, that the script was going someplace else entirely.


[The pilot] ... develops a tone that could be described as Coen-esque, but does so organically, in a way that assures you that it will become its own thing. The next three episodes get incrementally weirder, stronger, and more original, to the point that you forget to measure this Fargo against its namesake, or against any of the Coens' masterworks...

It's a good read, one that suggests that creator Hawley is definitely trying to distinguish his characters from the movie. Each one evokes a familiar feel and then subverts expectations. In Molly's case, it's by being a strong, smart female deputy... but necessarily single and childless to distinguish her as her own person and not a Margie clone, at least physically.


"Eating the Blame" (season 1 episode 4, wiki) establishes world continuity by having Oliver Platt's Stavros discover the satchel of money buried by Steve Buscemi's Carl.

If Fargo the TV show is happening 19 years after Fargo the movie, then it makes even more sense for the characters to be different.

It's more than an homage but not quite a reboot or reimagining. Almost a sequel.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.