Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The newest Hollywood trend seems to be taking old movies like Star Wars and Lion King and rerelease them with an additional third dimension to squeeze the last bit of money out of them.

Now it hit Titanic, which is currently running in the movies in a 3D version.

I was wondering: Are there any changes apart from the 3D effect that have been made to the theatrical version of Titanic, for example

  • cuts,
  • additional scenes,
  • cgi postproduction,
  • anything else?
share|improve this question
    
This is a most excellent question –  DForck42 Apr 12 '12 at 15:37
    
@DForck42: Thanks. My gf will drag me into cinema tonight to watch this and I'm not very fond of 3D recycles, so I thought I'd find out if there was at least some new footage to enjoy. Well, seems I have to settle for a new star field... ;) –  atticae Apr 12 '12 at 16:08
3  
@atticae I enjoyed the ironic line: 'now it hit Titanic' –  hexparrot Apr 12 '12 at 22:22
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 19 down vote accepted

James Cameron has been asked this a few times in the past weeks to the release of the movie, and he has said he did not want to change anything about the movie past adding 3D. However, it seems he admits to making a change while interviewing with a British magazine Culture. James Cameron resisted temptation to cut scenes he was no longer happy with when preparing to re-release his blockbuster film Titanic in 3D, [however...]

Neil deGrasse Tyson, who is one of the U.S.' leading astronomers, sent me quite a snarky email saying that, at that time of year, in that position in the Atlantic in 1912, when Rose is lying on the piece of driftwood and staring up at the stars, that is not the star field she would have seen, and with my reputation as a perfectionist, I should have known that and I should have put the right star field in.

"So I said, 'All right, you son of a bitch, send me the right stars for the exact time, 4:20 a.m. on April 15, 1912, and I'll put it in the movie,'" Cameron said. "So that's the one shot that has been changed."

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, great answer. So, if I understand correctly, he did not change the starfield, right? –  atticae Apr 12 '12 at 12:20
    
@atticae - added the extension to the quote. I thought it was self-evident before. –  wbogacz Apr 12 '12 at 12:59
3  
Here was Tyson's opinion on the matter, causing him to contact Cameron - "There she is looking up. There is only one sky she should have been looking at ... and it was the wrong sky! Worse than that, it was not only the wrong sky; the left-half of the sky was a mirror reflection of the right-half of the sky! It was not only wrong, it was lazy! And I'm thinking, this is wrong." –  wbogacz Apr 12 '12 at 13:04
1  
add comment

He re-rendered the stars in the sky over the sinking ship to make them accurate.

http://news.discovery.com/space/neil-degrasse-tyson-tightens-titanic-accuracy-120402.html

(and widely reported elsewhere).

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.