Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In The Truman Show, a child is adopted by a corporation. Often, people say corporations are legally considered as "people", insofar as tax law is concerned. But I doubt that a corporation can legally adopt a person in real life. Although, I can't find any credible evidence to support my hypothesis. Can anyone provide a reference to how plausible the premise of the Truman Show is? That is, is there any law barring a corporation from adopting a person?

share|improve this question

I'll interpret your question to specifically relate to US adoption laws, as you are referring to the case in the Truman Show.

I am not a legal expert - but I've briefly reviewed "Corporate personhood" (from Wikipedia) and "Who May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption?" (pdf from

I think in short the answer is no - under current laws a corporation could not adopt.

It appears that in general State adoption laws indicate that single adults or a husband and wife are generally required to be adopted parent (I know that in Michigan this is being challenged by a same sex couple who would like to be able to jointly adopt - but this does not challenge the premise of my answer). The state laws indicate minimum ages for adoptive parents and/or a minimum age gap between the new parent and adopted child. Corporations do not have 'age', and they are not generally referred to as adults.

Corporations are treated as people in some aspects of the law - this goes back to the constitution, both as corporations are groups of people and should be afforded protections as such, but also for convenience to treat corporations as entities. As a result they can enter into contracts, make political donations, be taxed or sue and be sued in the courts. However the courts have often restricted the rights of corporations and they do not have equal rights to citizens - e.g. a corporation has no right against self incrimination as a person does under the Fifth Amendment.

It seems to me that the rights of corporate personhood are resticted and current state laws would prevent adoption of a child by a corporation.

share|improve this answer

Adoption requires close scrutinizing of the prospective environment and guardians. They don't just allow anyone to adopt, and it is inconceivable that an entity (such as a corporation is) could actually adopt a child. The movie was purely satire about the voyeuristic nature of our current entertainment choices (particularly "Reality TV" shows).

share|improve this answer
Inconceivable, yes! But is it possible? That is, is there any law preventing it from a theoretical possibility? – Paul Mar 18 '14 at 3:31
Note: I've edited my question to reflect that this is what I'm really asking. – Paul Mar 18 '14 at 3:36
I think, perhaps, you do not know what that word means. ;o) I didn't think I had to be more specific, but the answer is absolutely, positively, 100% No. Adoption agencies seek to place a child in the best possible environment. A corporation does not have the structure that a family has, so it wouldn't even be considered under any circumstances. – Johnny Bones Mar 18 '14 at 11:46

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.