Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Most of the characters excluding Cobb and his wife, do not have very developed roles. The roles are actually shallow and it is at times hard to see the motivation behind characters to do what they do.

For example, to me, Arthur holds clutch for a few scenes in the movie but he has no back story to back up this motivation. Say for instance, Arthur was the brother of Cobb, instantly the audience can see his motivation. But despite of all of this, the movie is still good, viewers are still drawn in.

So what fills the void that we do not see left by underdeveloped characters?

share|improve this question
up vote 22 down vote accepted

I am not sure I agree that the characters are any less developed that many broadly similar movies.

Arthur is his partner - it is a professional business arrangement, he is being well paid to do this job. Eames is also being paid, and decides in the first dream level that it is not worth the risk - so clearly he is only motivated by the money. Yusuf is being paid twice to keep quiet about the dangers of the compounds he has made. Ariadne is being paid, is also fascinated by her new powers as an architect and has started to develop concerns for Cobb and his sanity. Saito is motivated by the power and money it will make his corporation. Robert Fischer as 'the mark' has the most complete back-story outside of Cobb and Mal.

How is this any different than other caper movies - Oceans Eleven, the Italian Job? Inception is very polished and has a ton of subtext thrown in, but substantially the characters have no more or less backstory than other movies about professional criminals.

In my opinion we are drawn in by a movie with very high standards of production, it looks great - the acting is good, the story is well paced and well explained despite its complexity, and we are drawn into the idea of double guessing whether Cobb is still in a dream or not at the end, and we don't quite know enough even at the end. Best big budget Hollywood movie in some time.

share|improve this answer
You are right Robert Fisher has the most complete story out of all. I guess I am trying to point at the fact that we are ignoring why each of these characters need the money (other than Saito), how Eames is able to change character (even outside his own dreams) and no else can. The plot itself is interesting and the acting is good so yes we are drawn in to figuring out whether Cobb is dreaming or not or has been dreaming for the entire show – phwd Dec 3 '11 at 0:25

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.