Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Prisoners is tinged with religion. Keller appears to be a deeply religious man. But he is very flexible with his morality when it comes to torturing Alex Jones for information about his daughter.

Similarly, the villains of the show are two people who have lost their faith in religion and in a bid for vengeance, start kidnapping and killing children.

Then there's the priest who is portrayed as a sex-offender (presumably a child molester) and a murderer.

Amidst all this, we have the more balanced Detective Loki (with a rather "heathen" name?) who is possibly not all that religious. I might be reading too much into his first scene where he is a bit derisive of Chinese fortune cookies.

share|improve this question
In addition to that Wikipedia says that "during some scenes, he [Loki] wears a ring with a Masonic symbol on it.", which would further emphasize his role as one of the few (if not the only one) reasonably thinking people in this story. Though on the other hand he also "has a number of religious symbols tattooed on his body.". – Napoleon Wilson Nov 15 '13 at 13:37
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I think it is more of a commentary on the human nature and behavior under extreme circumstances. Yes, the setting is very religiously painted, but I think it is here more to emphasize the main message, and less to comment on the religion itself.

Let's take a look at the two religious main characters.

  • Keller Dover is a deeply religious, one might say quite typical character (God, family, guns, paranoia from "anything that might happen",...). All that crumbles down when his daughter is kidnapped. He attacks Alex, later on he kidnaps him, tortures him,... By the end, when he is about to kill Alex, he prays:

    Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our trespasses, as we...
    [ breathing heavily ]
    As we for...
    [ exhales sharply ]

    As far as we know, he doesn't finish. At this point, he realizes what he became, how far he strung away from what he believed to be most important to him. However, he also hesitates in killing Alex, and seems cracking under his own deeds, while human and demon in him fight.

  • Holly Jones, as she herself explains:

    My husband and I were very devout at one time. Spent our summers driving around in that camper with our son, handing out pamphlets, spreading the good word.
    After our son died of cancer, we started seeing things differently.

    I see this as another example, in essence not very different from Keller, of deep devotion when things went smooth, and straying from the "good word" (that they themselves were preaching) after they were hit by a family tragedy.

Both of these characters needed a guilty face for their trouble (Keller turned on Alex, while Holly and her husband turned on God), both of them forgot the teaching of their own religion (and, more importantly, humanity) and went to a complete opposite when they faced the loss of a child,... Notice that they both violently attacked little children, since Alex was - very early in the movie - established to have the I.Q. of a ten years old child.

As Holly herself said (my emphasis):

Making children disappear is the war we wage with God. Makes people lose their faith. Turns them into demons like you.

Apart from the wording and apparent direct motivation of a character, this has nothing to do with religion. This direct motivation for killing children does come from Holly's and her husband's religion. Without it, they would have no one to wage their war against, at they would find meaning in killing innocent children. This is not unheard of, people doing terrible things in the name of religion.

I think that this is really the only thing that may be considered as an attack on religion. But I also think it is here more as an explanation of the characters motivation. Instead of a cliche explanation "they are crazy" (which is a shallow explanation that script writers use as a synonym for "we had a good story, but couldn't explain why this all happened"), this gave a nice, realistic explanation of what was going on and why. Religion-crazed people do kill other people, including children, all the time. Random lunatics are not so common in the real world.

It also serves the realism in another way: there are no absolute villains. Keller (almost) lost his daughter, but did terrible - we might say worse than death - things to Alex, who turned out to be just a misunderstood victim. Holly and her husband were monsters, but they themselves suffered the terrible fate of losing a child after leading what they perceived as an exemplary life. Nancy and Franklin didn't directly do as much damage to Alex as Keller did, but they are far from being innocent; however, they had their fair share of pain before walking that path.

If anything, the movie is a commentary on how nothing is black and white, and how people crack when it's about their children, and religion is there as a way of showing that, instead of being the main topic itself.

share|improve this answer
I really need to quote the Joker here: Don't talk like one of them, you're not! [...] See, their morals, their code... it's a bad joke. Dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you, when the chips are down, these... these civilized people? They'll eat each other. This is really not far from what this movie was showing. Maybe the Joker wrote the script and just gave it to Aaron Guzikowski? :-D – Vedran Šego Nov 22 '13 at 23:45
Well, in this case I'm really glad Batman didn't kill him. Would have cost us a fine movie, I think. ;-) – Napoleon Wilson Nov 22 '13 at 23:58

The title "Prisoners" has a relation with the characters own prisons, based on their own belief systems: religion, justice, family, obsessions. Doing what they think is right for them (not necesarily for others) they fall apart, and the movie is witness of this process.

So, more than anti-religion, i think is more pro-human, in a more nihilistic way.

share|improve this answer
Related: – Napoleon Wilson Sep 12 '15 at 13:45

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.