Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Thor: The Dark World, what is the significance of the Erik's nude scene? Is it just for comedy effect? But if I remember correctly he justified it, but I don't understand the point. Even he was shown pant-less again in another scene. Is there any justification for it or just a comedy oriented non-justified scene?

share|improve this question
    
which movie are we talking about ? –  Hussain Akhtar Wahid 'Ghouri' Nov 13 '13 at 8:01
    
@HussainAkhtarWahid Thor:the dark world, its mentioned in tag –  Ankit Sharma Nov 13 '13 at 8:02
    
Are you asking what he was actually doing there at Stonehenge and why he was so crazy? If you're just asking why he was nude, then that was just to emphasize his craziness. But why he was slightly crazy or fanatic I can't tell right away, maybe his "occupation" by Loki didn't go without side effects or maybe he just got a bit more excentric and fanatic about his research than normal. –  Napoleon Wilson Nov 13 '13 at 8:37
1  
I would add that this is an homage to a famous quote by Albert Einstein: "If one studies too zealously, one easily loses his pants." –  Ben Plont Nov 14 '13 at 5:09
1  
I wonder if we would be having this question if it was Natalie Portman's nude scene! –  Liath Nov 14 '13 at 13:17
show 2 more comments

1 Answer

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Personally, I believe that it was simply to show that he really have lost his mind. But that pants-less scene was done when he seemed completely sane, thus it seemed as if it's because of his natural queerness. Indeed yes, I think it was mentioned that Erik Selvig's mind hasn't completely returned sane after Loki invaded his mind. To quote Selvig himself:

I had a god in my mind.

In addition, Selvig also said something like this:

Finally, The world is crazier than I am.

It shows that he is fully aware that he is crazy, and someone who can asses himself as insane, is, usually, someone who still retain a degree of sanity. This is completely different in behavior than what he did at Stonehenge, suggesting that it was indeed an action that was completely not deliberate. He didn't seem to show any shame or regret in doing that, though, which I guess attributes itself to the partial madness.

share|improve this answer
    
+1, make sense. –  Ankit Sharma Nov 13 '13 at 9:39
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.