Tell me more ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've heard that sounds tend to be dubbed in afterwards, rather than being recorded live. Everything from walking to opening and shutting doors. What is the reason for doing this?

share|improve this question
I'm not an expert but the logical reason would be the editing of the video, which would have destroyed the sound synchronization of the sound was pre-recorded. – DVK Feb 25 '12 at 23:01
It's so obvious,If it recorded live, how the sound engineer and musician could do the audio effects? – Vijin Paulraj Feb 26 '12 at 7:43

2 Answers

up vote 15 down vote accepted

From the wikipedia page on Foley Artists.

Foley artists look to recreate the realistic ambient sounds that the film portrays. The props and sets of a film do not react the same way acoustically as their real life counterparts. Foley sounds are used to enhance the auditory experience of the movie. Foley can also be used to cover up unwanted sounds captured on the set of a movie during filming that might take away from the scene at hand, such as overflying airplanes or passing traffic.

Here is a great website on how it's done.

share|improve this answer
I was going to say the same thing. Good answer +1 – Advicer Feb 25 '12 at 23:25

The main reason is really cost, plus you can get far better results in a Foley stage.

Recording sounds live is very expensive and difficult to get each of the sounds independently so that they can be properly mixed later. Say that you want to record the sounds you describe live where there are footsteps and a door shutting. You would have to record two separate sounds for each to allow for later flexibility in mixing the sounds. Furthermore you have the entire crew (who would need to be very quiet) waiting around while the sound guys do their work. Alternatively, they= sound crew could come back after the main crew leave and record the sounds, but this require access to the location for a longer period of time (and again results increasing the cost).

Or consider the case of a restaurant scene where the main characters are engaged in a conversation. When shooting such scenes, all the background people pretend to be chatting and eating but they have to refrain from making any background noise such are knives hitting plates. These sounds are added later which ensures that they are at the appropriate mixing level and the appropriate time so as to not distract from the dialog

Furthermore, a lot of sounds are added that were not part of the scene that was shot, for example outdoor ambiance: The sounds of crickets are added to indicate that this scene is a t night -- even in cases where such sounds would not exist as is the case for highrise in New York for instance. Or African jungle sounds are added to indicate that one is in the wild, even though the scene is in Vietnam for instance.

There is one notable except to this and that is when recording background ambient noise or "room tone". When shooting on location, there is always some background noise. In every day life we get used to hearing that and don't even notice it. At some point during the shooting of a scene the background noise will be recorded in case it needs to be mixed in later. This will involve all the normal sounds emanating from the film crew and the background noise. So for instance if the air conditioner went on in an adjacent room for one take of a scene, but was off in separate take of the same scene, this would be very noticeable when the scene was cut together. This room tone recording would be used to smooth out the background noise so that the ambient noise would not be too jarring.

If you really want to get a feel of how much work goes into the sound design, you need to close you eyes and not look at the picture. One of the best examples is the opening scene in Apocalypse now. Try it for yourself and see. Well, not see, but you know what I mean.

share|improve this answer
2  
Another thing to note from a technical standpoint is that the boom mics used on sets are highly directional in order to get a clean feed of the actors; by design they have a tight pickup pattern (super- or hyper-cardioid) meaning they have a high level of off-axis rejection (essentially, any sound not approaching from directly in front of the microphone will be reduced in volume a LOT). This means you can get great speech, but on-set, live diegetic sound recordings are virtually ruled out by this. In some blockbusters, set vocals are only used as a guide and the entire film is ADRed & foleyed. – Christopher Woods Feb 28 '12 at 1:41

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.