Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In Blade Runner, replicant detection occurs via the subject's ability/inability to show advanced emotion. But early in the movie Deckard starts off as emotionless as the replicants.

How do the differences between Deckard and the replicants (specifically Roy and Rachel) progress throughout the movie?

share|improve this question
@NapoleonWilson just wondering why the removal of the ridley-scott tag from all of these? Seems that anyone interested in Ridley Scott films may prefer to use that as a tag to find them. – DA. Jun 13 '15 at 23:52
@DA. Because those questions are not about Ridley Scott. They are about movies directed by Ridley Scott, but that doesn't make them questions about Ridley Scott. We haven't tagged them science-fiction, harrison-ford and hampton-fancher either. For more information see the respective meta discussion. – Napoleon Wilson Jun 13 '15 at 23:53
@NapoleonWilson just my opinion, but that seems to defeat the purpose of tagging. As long as the tags are relevant, I'd think the more, the merrier, as it exposes more questions to those people that are interested in it. I'll contribute to the meta discussion. – DA. Jun 13 '15 at 23:59
@DA. But what tags to use when they're merely classifying the movie that is talked about but not the actual question? That is clearly not how tagging works at all. The tags apply to the question, not the movie in question. Of course as long as they're relevant the more the merrier, but fact is, if they're not about the question they're, well, not relevant in the first place. – Napoleon Wilson Jun 14 '15 at 0:00
@NapoleonWilson I'd argue that the title applies directly to the question. Tags apply to both the question itself, and the subject matter within--which can be tangential. They can act as a "See also" type of navigation. (in more simple terms: People interested in Ridley Scott who want to follow the Ridley Scott tag, are also interested in Ridley Scott films) – DA. Jun 14 '15 at 0:07
up vote 18 down vote accepted

Actually, the movie is quite ambiguous about whether Deckard is actually a human or a replicant, Ridley Scott takes him as a replicant, while Harrison Ford believes he is human. Even though Deckard shows more and more emotions as the movie goes on, the same is true about the other replicants.

The ambiguity is IMHO, indeed an important part of the point of the movie (and the original novel) – what is the difference between humans and machines. And (a persistent theme in P.K.Dick’s works) how can you be sure you are, in fact, a human, not a machine?

See also: Deckard: human or replicant?

share|improve this answer

The novel is less subtle about posing the question about who is an android or not. In the novel Deckard goes to retire an android who makes a phone call for help before being killed. The police who show up are from a 'shadow' police department who are nearly all androids themselves living under cover. Deckard escapes with a blade-runner who works with this fake police department who didn't realize he was working with androids and perhaps was even 'retiring' humans. Deckard and the second blade runner debate who is an android and who is human, and who should take the 'test'. Adding to confusion, they both have different tests they use. The novel had already introduced Rachel, the android who believed she was Tyrrel's niece, to lay the ground for androids who do not know they are not human. In addition, throughout the book there is a major plot thread about his electric sheep and whether he lacked empathy by not purchasing a real pet.

The movie does not include many of the plot elements from the novel, but it more subtly introduces the question about whether Decker is an android or not. It leaves the viewer with many more open questions and is as a result an excellent but different story.

share|improve this answer

I think that has to do the book, the movie adapts. In Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? all people are a bit like zombies, they only want to go away from earth or follow a strange religion like Deckards wife does. In a scene in the book, another Blade Runner suspects Deckard to be a replicant and makes a test with him. I think, Philip K. Dick wanted to show, that the difference between humans and machines isn't that big, as we think.

In the movie Ridley Scott seems to make a little different point. For me the movie said, that androids are able to the same emotions and empathy as humans, if they develop it (so states the theory, that humanity is developed). Deckard makes like Rachel and Roy the progress to humanity, although they take different directions.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.