Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I went to see Hugo in 3D today, and beforehand there was a trailer for the upcoming re-release of Titanic in 3D. I must say, I was impressed.

How much of the conversion to 3D of a movie that was shot in 2D is done by hand? I assume they don't have to go through every single frame -- there are probably close to 280,000 frames for a 3+ hour film like Titanic. Perhaps for a scene can certain items be marked as in the foreground and a computer used to track them through several frames?

share|improve this question
1  
One word: Badly. –  mootinator Feb 20 '12 at 5:23
    
What makes anyone think that adding another dimension to a crappy movie (Titanic, Episode I) will make it a good movie? –  Flimzy Feb 20 '12 at 7:44
1  
Perhaps the right question would be WHY? –  matt_black Mar 4 '12 at 0:40

2 Answers 2

up vote 12 down vote accepted

2D to 3D Video Conversion is the process of transforming the original 2D video to a 3D form, which in almost all cases is stereo, so it is the process of creating imagery for each eye from one 2D image. That is why the transformation is also called 2D to stereo 3D conversion, or stereo conversion.

Two approaches to stereo conversion can be loosely defined: quality semiautomatic conversion for cinema and high quality 3DTV, and low quality automatic conversion for cheap 3DTV, VOD and similar applications.

The idea is that a separate auxiliary picture known as the "depth map" is created for each frame or for a series of homogenous frames to indicate depths of objects present in the scene. The depth map is a separate grayscale image having the same dimensions as the original 2D image, with various shades of gray to indicate the depth of every part of the frame. While depth mapping can produce a fairly potent illusion of 3D objects in the video, it inherently does not support semi-transparent objects or areas, nor does it allow explicit use of occlusion, so these and other similar issues should be dealt with in a specific way.

The price on high quality stereo conversion varies in the range of $25,000..100,000 per minute according to several estimates. In your case, Titanic's 3D conversion is estimated to $18,000,000. You can read more about techniques here or read about conversion of some famous movies here.

share|improve this answer
    
The comments in the second article (Art of Stereo conversion: 2D to 3D) you linked to, by people that actually worked on some of the conversions were very interesting. That article also answers the questions in the second paragraph of my question -- it is still mostly a manual process, involving hundreds or more artists. –  tcrosley Feb 20 '12 at 15:21

3D movies are normally filmed using two slightly offset cameras.

Both images are projected onto the viewing screen, with those plastic glasses feeding one image into your left eye and the other into your right.

When a film was not shot using two offset cameras, the conversion involves manual identification of different depths in the shot, as summarized in this Gizmodo Article:

Graphic artists separate shots out into layers of depth, which can number anywhere from two layers for shots with simple blocking to eight for shots with more complex compositions. Then, the objects in each layer are carefully traced, creating a topographical map of the scene. Here, the computer steps in, simulating the second camera's perspective by generating another, slightly offset image. The images in the layers closest to the viewer are offset the most, creating the illusion of things popping off the screen, while the background is only offset slightly.

A more detailed procedure is explained at Slate.

share|improve this answer
    
This is the process of converting "normal 2D movies" into 3D. Did you check the heading of the article and read through that? The quoted part, explains that graphic artists work on the shots and use computer simulation to add the perspective of second camera! –  Incognito Feb 20 '12 at 11:31
    
Also, topographical image, which has been mentioned in my quoted piece, means "depth map", which has been used in the answer by @Advicer –  Incognito Feb 20 '12 at 11:32
1  
@Incognito, I agree that you did answer my question, and upvoted your answer to offset the -1. However the first line was a little misleading and sounded like you were just going to explain how 3D works. Your links were useful, but I accepted Advicer's answer because the second article he linked to addressed more of the issues in my question. –  tcrosley Feb 20 '12 at 15:26
    
Thanks @tcrosley. The first line was to give an outline of how 3D movies are actually made so that the process of converting 2D to 3D makes sense! And I agree, answer posted by Advicer deserves to be accepted as an answer. –  Incognito Feb 21 '12 at 4:01

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.