Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In the movie Now You See Me, Henley wears gloves all the time. Did I miss some explanation for this in the movie? Or is there some out of movie explanation, like she's a germophobe?

enter image description here

share|improve this question
    
She doesn't wear gloves while robbing the armored truck in Paris and doesn't wear gloves in her piranha stunt. who knows, just likes to leave no trace...except while robbing a armored car. –  DrewbyD Mar 8 at 14:48

2 Answers 2

The in-universe explanation is that she's germophobic. From an interview:

Does Henley wear gloves so often for any particular reason?

Jesse: Germs.

Isla: She's germ-phobic.

That said, she is not wearing gloves during the piranha stunt.

share|improve this answer
4  
Why would that be an out-of-movie explanation when they're obviously talking about Henley and not Isla. (Yet I'm not sure that wasn't just a joke they made, anyway, but since we don't know it makes for a valid in-move explanation) –  Sonny Burnett Aug 31 '13 at 13:03
1  
like Christian said, they're talking about Henley. And, the reason she's not wearing gloves during the piranha stunt is because that really wouldn't have made any difference in protecting her from all the "horrible germs" in the tank.. though, one might wonder why she'd do a trick like that in the first place considering her germophobia... –  Tom Aug 31 '13 at 13:18
    
@ChristianRau It's an out-of-movie explanation because it isn't explained in the movie. –  coleopterist Aug 31 '13 at 18:41
1  
@coleopterist Well Ok, from that viewpoint you might be right, still the more important distinction would be if the reason itself is in-movie or out-of-movie (apart from its mere explanation). Yet you got a point. –  Sonny Burnett Aug 31 '13 at 19:51
    
@ChristianRau There's a sequel planned. We might have to wait until that comes out :) –  coleopterist Aug 31 '13 at 20:17

I noticed that the gloves are black but red on the palms so I always figured it was supposed to be ironic - 'caught red handed'

share|improve this answer
    
This sounds opinion-based as opposed to a real answer. Do have anything to back up your claim? –  Meat Trademark May 10 at 11:50
    
@MeatTrademark You mean it sounds opinion based and like a real answer. –  Sonny Burnett May 10 at 13:26
    
@NapoleonWilson Not really. It just sounds like an opinion and a real comment. Besides, the phrase isn't "caught red-palmed." Had the gloves been entirely red it'd be a little more plausible IMO. –  Meat Trademark May 10 at 17:56

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.