Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When getting Rhodes out of the suit, there is a scene showing Killian breathing fire.

Aldrich Killian breathing fire

Why did he not use the same against Tony Stark when fighting him at the end of the movie? Or why did he not use it again at all?

share|improve this question
8  
These are sort of question one shouldn't ask. Just enjoy the movie. Probably the director didn't thought of it either. –  minusSeven Aug 28 '13 at 13:49
1  
"To me it looks a plot inconsistency." - That's the point, it's most probably nothing more than that. If there is more to it, then Ok we know something new, if not then well, so what. Still I don't blame you for asking it, even if I doubt the answer being anything else than "because that's what happened". –  Napoleon Wilson Aug 28 '13 at 14:21
1  
I asked for the possibility that someone somewhere might have some absurd theory that'll make some sense out of nothing ! –  kicker86 Aug 28 '13 at 14:48
1  
Yeah, I see, still your reaction to minusSeven's comment sounded as if noone couldn't ever not notice this severe plot-problem. But I see that this may have bothered you much more than me or minusSeven, so good luck with an answer on it (no sarcasm). –  Napoleon Wilson Aug 28 '13 at 15:05
1  
Possible, that Killian is quite stationary when "fire breathing" so if he did that close to Tony, Tony would just fly around behind him and beat him up etc? –  Jared Aug 28 '13 at 21:36
show 4 more comments

3 Answers

Looking at the scene, it looks like the fire breath takes quite a bit of effort to do and being constantly in battle with the Iron Man obviously was draining to Aldrich. Additionally he then got blown up in the suit weakening him even more!

share|improve this answer
    
Also, all or most of the Iron-man suits were built from a tactical satellite quality material, which would definitely be able to sustain the temperature. As we see from the scene with Rhody, the suit was NOT damaged despite taking that much heat. So simply put, That particular attack would have been pretty ineffective against Ironman and Aldrich knew it wasn't worth the effort. –  Ashish Kulkarni Feb 12 at 5:05
add comment

Watching the scene again, it's quite clear the fire-breathing moment was the result of a purge required after sustained use of extremis' exothermic capabilities.

After applying extreme heat through his palms (for what is inferred to be some time), Rhodes is ejected from the suit. Killian seems to struggle for a few moments in an attempt to contain the sudden halt of this process, before venting the built up energy through his projectile fire-breath.

Both Killian and Savin look somewhat shocked at this. It appears as though this has never happened before, but perhaps only because circumstances have never dictated such application.

Killian even make a remark about this, claiming it is 'new day' in reference to this development.

Given the spontaneity of the reaction, its unlikely Killian would be able or willing to try and reproduce it in a weaponized way...

share|improve this answer
add comment

Let's take a few things in mind:

  1. Iron Man 3 is based on Extremis comic book which features these superpowers on people who use the extremis virus. Obviously the whole scene is a reference to the comic.
  2. Why ask "why didn't he", instead ask "would you" or something similar. The whole idea of someone forgetting or not being able to do something is for the most time a really big part of the movie (although not this one for sure but I hope you get my point)
  3. Was there any weakness to that power he used? Was it maybe just a onetime power he could use? Was it even efficient enough to be used against Stark? Was that really fire and did it hurt him when he was using it?
  4. Maybe the whole fire scene was a plot device to show how serious Killian was. Maybe it was nothing more than a MacGuffin to quickly turn him into a really bad guy who SHOULD be taken more seriously than we thought.
share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.