Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In the sequence set to the Blue Danube Waltz, we see a Pan Am orbital shuttle docking with a partially-completed space station. Here is a clip from that sequence on YouTube. There are good views of the space station at 0:02-0:28 and 1:28-1:46 in that clip that keep the camera at a respectful distance, as would be expected given late 1960s technology: models (since no CGI yet) and large cameras guided on rails (no motion control, either). But the final shot (1:56-2:17) has the camera viewpoint go through the structure of the space station! How was this accomplished? Was the model the size of a house, or did Kubrick have something else up his sleeve?

share|improve this question
up vote 10 down vote accepted

At first I thought it might have been a breakaway model, used by the likes of Orsen Welles to make a camera appear to pass through a neon sign or window in Citizen Kane, but then I watched the clip and realized this could not be the case.

I have had some experience with motion control cameras, and this certainly seems to have been produced using a track system and large model. Some further digging revealed that the studio model was approximately 8 feet in diameter, which accounts for the astonishing level of detail and the fact that a camera can pass right through it.

share|improve this answer
Thanks, especially for the link. I thought that an 8-foot model would have been too tight a fit for a 65mm Panavision camera, but I've just found out that their first "hand held" model (24 lbs!) was released in 1960; perhaps that was what was used. – FredH May 9 '13 at 4:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.