Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The machines are keeping humans alive for their body heat, right? But they also have nuclear fusion reactors, and (while I haven't run the numbers) I'd be willing to bet that a single fusion reactor would generate more net energy in an hour than all the humans on today’s Earth would in a day.

I have one more additional doubt:

Why people, instead of animals that don't need a computer simulation to keep their brains entertained?

Why do the machines keep humans alive if they have nuclear reactors?

share|improve this question
6  
Because it would make for a terribly boring movie otherwise? –  Napoleon Wilson May 8 '13 at 8:05
1  
Duplicate with scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/1263/… –  Geerten May 8 '13 at 9:10
1  
"Why people, instead of animals that don't need a computer simulation to keep their brains entertained?" - You sure they don't? Or, you sure humans do (well in the movie they do, but in the movie animals could as well need a matrix)? Humans probably don't really need a matrix either, but the movie needs one that replicates the 20th century. So given this rather unlikely premise, it is hard to say how/if it would work with animals and if they might need their own matrix. But then again "it wouldn't make for an interesting movie, man!" –  Napoleon Wilson Sep 4 '13 at 13:44
    
Because the original reasoning, that humanities brains were to be utilized in some kind of large scale supercomputer for the machines purposes, was turned to energy production due to executive meddling. –  whatsisname 9 hours ago

5 Answers 5

up vote 18 down vote accepted

Well, whatever the reason machines keep humans alive, it is definitely NOT because of humans' excellence in the role of batteries. However it is possible that the machines themselves are spreading that myth. (For example Morpheus would believe anything the Oracle says). That machines don't really need humans for power is revealed in the last part, when the Architect agrees to free all humans from the Matrix.

The actual reasons may be much more complicated, and much more humane. The machines just don't want humans to become extinct, just like we humans are trying to protect Siberian tigers, as well as other endangered species. Even though a tiger may kill a human given the chance.

However protecting humans is much harder than the tigers. You can't put them in a cage, because then their minds will degrade. You can't let them roam free, because they probably won't survive in the new world, or because they will probably keep trying to fight the machines until they kill themselves. Humans aren't very rational, you see.

As a solution, the tandem Matrix - Zion was created. The Matrix is conveniently situated right next to the Zion so that people in Zion can focus the majority of their energy in "freeing" others from the Matrix. Also, quite conveniently, the Matrix lacks any real defense mechanisms.

If there was just Zion without the Matrix, the humans would be trying to develop nuclear weapons or EMP bombs in order to launch the assault on the machines. Obviously they would fail, but they will also kill themselves in the attempt.

If there was just Matrix without Zion, then such system would run a risk of collapsing and destroying the humankind if some unforeseen catastrophe occurs. The machines aren't really good at adapting to sudden changes. And they are vulnerable to other unpredictable factors (such as Agent Smith). The machines know that, but they can't do much about it.

Now why do they need to destroy Zion every now and then? Well, first of all they probably don't see it as much of a big deal -- the population of Zion is comparatively low. Plus they want to keep them from acquiring too dangerous technologies. Plus in most cases the goal is not really destruction, but rather the threat of destruction. For example in the last movie, several EMP charges could have destroyed the majority of attackers. The machines know that, and they probably launched the attack with the goal of failing, but making humans more scared. The machines didn't foresee however that Agent Smith would be able to interfere and stop those EMPs.

So in summary, it's all a well-orchestrated plan to keep humans busy, and alive.

share|improve this answer
2  
There are several factual inaccuracies here. "The Matrix" isn't near Zion, they need to use ships to get to and from places where they can hack in to the Matrix. The plan for the attack in the last movie was for them to wipe out Zion, the Architect says as much. –  user209 May 9 '13 at 15:58
4  
We don't know the actual distance. But considering that "Machines" had an entire Earth surface at their disposal, Zion is suspiciously close to the Matrix. They use ships primarily because the city itself is deep underground. As for the attack, they chose rather inefficient method if their real goal was wiping humans. A lethal gas, or air-borne virus would have been much quicker, and reliable, and cheaper. You can't really trust everything Architect says, besides he himself might not possess the full information. –  Pasha S May 10 '13 at 0:06

It's part of the allegorical elements of the film. By being powered by people, the machines are literally taking the power from the people (i.e. the opposite of 'power to the people'). So the machines are only existing because of the people's power, the people having sort of surrendered it to the machines. This is in addition to the in-Matrix subjugation humans also suffer.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1, I like this answer. I think explains a lot. –  Mathew Foscarini May 8 '13 at 14:30

I think, within the movie's logic, it is because humans reproduce and therefore continually provide energy (ISTR that humans are even fed on human corpses) whereas nuclear reactors use finite energy sources.

share|improve this answer
    
Could the divebomber leave a comment to let me know what the issue is, please? –  Stefan May 9 '13 at 15:40
    
While not being the downvoter a reason might be that it sounds like humans were an infinite energy source (which as you probably know from biology/physics they can't be). –  Napoleon Wilson Sep 4 '13 at 13:42
    
The film does come very close to implying this. In the first film they explicitly state that dead humans are recycled as food. The science behind the Matrix film series contains many errors, have a look on the ISMP film review of it. –  Stefan Sep 4 '13 at 21:04

My interpretation was that the body farms weren't used to generate energy, but to store it. i.e. the duracell battery that Morpheus holds up. If you have pulsed or unpredictable power sources, you need massive storage to match the supply to the demand. The leading fusion power concept today is the tokamak, which is a pulsed machine. Renewable energy sources are generally weather-dependent and hence unpredictable.

On the other hand I can't imagine that humans are very efficient for energy storage, compared to animals or any other inanimate technology. In that respect it seems more like a plot device.

share|improve this answer

My theory is that the Machines lack one thing that only Humans can have -> "Creativity".

The machines can maintain the status quo, but for any new technology development, they need human brains. Therefore, the machines keep all humans alive, to harvest their brain power for advancing the technology.

share|improve this answer
    
Yet they wouldn't keep them in the 20th century and rather further their advances to gain actual new ideas. The machine war is probably much in the future and humans already had developed things far beyond what they could think of in the 1999 of the matrix. In fact the machines already use far higher technology than what was current at that time. –  Napoleon Wilson Sep 9 '13 at 16:28
    
Re:Christian, I'm talking about just brain power, not humans developing technologies in the simulation, but the machines just need human brain to develop new technologies on their own. As you may know, human brains is possibly a billion times faster than the fastest computer. –  KoKo Sep 12 '13 at 3:52
    
So what is it then what you're saying? That the machines use the brains that are currently occupied by the matrix to think their own stuff for them? Sounds infeasible. What one calls brain power is either the actual electircal power of the brains, whose harvesting wouldn't be any different from the premise of the question and all the other answers, or the conceptual power of the thoughts that can be thought by them (which seems to be what you're after), which isn't really harvestable in any way, especially when those brains are ocupied by a different simulation. –  Napoleon Wilson Sep 12 '13 at 7:29

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.