Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

One of the things that I have always found striking about 2001 is the almost mechanical acting of the human characters, especially the radio operator. I'm pretty sure it's a conscious choice on part of Kubrick, but what is it supposed to symbolize?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 28 down vote accepted

I have watched all of Stanley Kubrick's movies. He wants you to know that he's in control of the pace of the movie. You'll be fed each line when he's ready to feed it to you.

All of Kubrick's movies tend to have a lot of white space, empty space where no one is doing or saying anything; they are merely existing. Listen to the non-human pace of Nicole Kidman's character (in Eyes Wide Shut). You are hanging on every word.

Kubrick creates tension through his use of pace. The actors aren't being stoic. They are moving and speaking at a real life pace, not the pace of normal movies.

share|improve this answer
    
Ah, never thought about it like that. –  phwd Dec 1 '11 at 13:54
10  
+1 "They are moving and speaking at a real life pace, not the pace of normal movies." That is a very very good point that I have never considered! –  System Down Dec 1 '11 at 17:29
1  
Aren't "You'll be fed each line when he's ready to feed it to you" and "They are moving and speaking at a real life pace" contradictory? –  puri Dec 1 '11 at 18:49
2  
@puri, it may or may not be contradictory. It's been said that "art abstracts the essence of life". That means that normal human dialogue and action is condensed to fit the film format. I believe that Kubrick does what is normal in life but abnormal in film. So, on film, characters seem slow and distracted and boring. That natural human flow seems to contradict what seems natural on film. –  Evik James Dec 1 '11 at 19:20
1  
@Evik Um...I think you missed something. You mention that we should "listen to the non-human pace of Nicole Kidman's character." The casual reader might not realize you're talking about an entirely different (unmentioned) movie here. –  Beska Dec 9 '11 at 20:30
show 1 more comment

From my perspective, it's partly to contrast HAL's childlike behavior and to also show human evolution from apes to logical beings.

share|improve this answer
add comment

One of the things I found interesting about the entire sequence in the Discovery is a sort of reversing: Bowman and Poole behave coldly, don't give in to emotions and seem--at least emotionally--always in control of the situation. HAL, on the other hand, is the one that cracks under pressure and panicks.

So, of all the crew, HAL is the real human character.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.