Take the 2-minute tour ×
Movies & TV Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for movie and tv enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Mr. Nobody, the concept of time-travel is blended with the butterfly effect.

In the movie, when the old man tells his story as a child, he says that he chose his mommy and daddy because they would tell him about the butterfly effect.

Later, the child says he can predict future. So, did he really have the butterfly effect? And if he had it, then why is it shown that he will be in a future where he will be dying at the instant the universe will reverse??

share|improve this question
"So, did he really had the butterfly effect?" - Could you please explain better what you understand as "butterfly effect" here? –  Napoleon Wilson Mar 6 '13 at 8:23
I think, as the child says, he can predict future, and his power to goto another time domains where he can see himself as being into the effect of what choice he is taking presently, is the butterfly effect, as I suppose –  ashutosh Mar 6 '13 at 9:22
@ashutosh - The "butterfly effect" is not an ability or superpower, it's a term for 'small changes can lead to big differences'. –  Oliver_C Mar 6 '13 at 15:22
add comment

5 Answers

up vote 7 down vote accepted

I believe that the movie has nothing to do with time travel and, as Oliver_C mentioned in a comment, the butterfly effect is not an ability, it is just cause-effect gone to extremes("Does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?").

The following lines are solely based on my own interpretation of the movie, hence no external links or proof will be provided. It is no need to say that spoilers will follow.

The whole movie is about the tough decision a child is facing when having to decide whether to live with his mother or with his father. It is not easy to choose something like this, especially when you're a child. This is about 90% of the movie: the child is actually standing between his parents trying very hard to make the best decision. In his mind, there are a lot of possibilities. THIS is what we actually see: it is not time travel, nor seeing the future, but the child's imagination. He tries to picture his whole life with each of the parents in order to be able to choose whatever should seem better.

We cannot be sure whether one of the stories actually occur. Absolutely nothing is certain - everything is pure imagination. It is like day-dreaming: you picture something and then one thing leads to another and you find yourself wondering what's it like to be old and having grandchildren. Still, in the movie, this "daydreaming" part is not as pleasant as it should be, it happens under a lot of stress and all this thoughts probably occur in just a few minutes.

To my mind, this is the movie's theme: the toughest decision a child has to make - choosing only one of his parents, that is deciding his own future.

In the end, after being asked which story is the true one, the old man refuses to pick one. He states that all of them are equally true and that is no right, nor wrong answer. This has multiple meanings.

In the first place, I don't think his intention was to actually tell the story of his life. When you are the eldest person in the world and dying, I don't believe that your main intention is to tell the people how your life has been. It seems a better decision to tell the whole world a message. After so many years of experience, the question shouldn't be "What have you done so far?" but "What have you learned? What would you tell to all the young people?". Nobody should actually care about the ups and downs in another person's life. The title is Mr Nobody, meaning that he was no extraordinary person, he was just nobody, like everybody else. Returning to the original question and it's interesting answer, I believe that the message is the following: we shouldn't consume ourselves trying to figure out what is the correct decision in life. Life is about living, one thing will lead to the other and you cannot predict what will follow. As you have seen in the movie, apparently bad decisions have led to happy moments, while doing always the right thing might get you bored, dissatisfied and maybe finally killed. That is why there is no right, nor wrong decision in life. They are all just options.

In the second place, there might be a reference to quantum mechanics. You can read more about various theories here about the many-worlds interpretation and here about the Copenhagen interpretation. The very popular experiment with Schroedinger's cat might also be a good example. To sum the theories up: when facing multiple possibilities, before making a choice/some sort of measurement, every possible outcome is actually an alternate universe. Now, one theory states that every time a decision/measurement is made, many other parallel universes are created. This way every possibility actually gets materialized, only it happens in parallel universes. Other theories state that upon deciding/measuring results, all parallel universes collapse into a single one, but before measurement everything is equally real. Hopefully I haven't mixed them up and understood this ideas good enough.

All in all, it is my opinion that all the tiny actions with unexpected huge reactions are not necessarily true. Everything is narrated by the main character and he couldn't have known what was happening in other parts of the world(see the episode with the guy working at a shoe factory being fired). What is more, all the possible lives are made of various decisions that have interesting effects in time. All these are references to the butterfly effect but, as I have said earlier, nothing is necessarily true. Everything is possible.

share|improve this answer
I think I slightly disagree with it being entirely imagined in the normal sense. I think the boy had some sort of ability that normal people don't have. I don't claim to have have it completely understood, I am still digesting this. But... Consider the beginning, where the angel forgets to touch his lip and make him forget. It is said that he is left with the ability to see his entire life before him. I think in this movie is the idea of being able to see the future, but the future is not one solid deterministic thing. Instead, he is able to see the multitude of possibilities before him. –  Joe Edgar Apr 6 at 15:51
Otherwise, I largely agree with you. One major theme is choice (but not in the typical choice vs determinism sense). It emphasizes the huge impacts that choices have on our entire lives, while showing that even if we knew how big those impacts would be, we would still be left with just as difficult a decision. Knowing the future, in that sense, is worthless. This kind of leads to a message of just living your life, enjoying its beauty and doing the best you can. At the end the old man seems to think all of those possible lives were equally beautiful, and wonders how could he choose one. –  Joe Edgar Apr 6 at 15:56
add comment

So far, I like most of the reviews that I have read.. All the reviews are very plausible explanations but I've noticed that nobody mentions the fact that this person, before being born, wasn't touched by the Angels of Oblivion on the top of the mouth. He was missed so he retained all of his memories. For this reason, he remembers picking out his parents... maybe then, the reason he knows everything is because he has lived all of those lives, each time that the universe expands and contracts it's as though life is being repeated but also, they are all happening concurrently because time is something that we have made up. In realty, if it can even be called that,there is no concept of time and in a way, that's more like a higher being, like God, almost. How He can be everywhere at once, it's just that it's too far over our heads to even understand.. Kinda like, if we learned to use our brains to its fullest potential. If so we would be able to levitate, travel through time, etc.. Or maybe he did make a choice and that is why the date when he dies is so significant. Maybe, his life as he lived it, the life that ended with him being an old man in the year 2090 is the life that he chose and so in order to have it happen again, he has to, in a way, cheat. Just as he unknowingly cheated at the beginning by not having his memories erased.. The more I think about this, the more possibilities pop into my head.. before I have even finished one possible explanation, others take control of my mind.. . never mind.. i don't want to think about this anymore..But, I love that soundtrack. Your Precious Love and the song about how everyday, it's getting better, rolling faster than a roller coaster.. lol

share|improve this answer
add comment

well this is solely based on my interpretation of the movie and i will try to say it as broad as possible. the old nemo is real and every sub-stories in the movie will lead into this. the middle-aged nemo is not. it is just the imagination of his younger self. the young nemo is the realest story here.

my ending the real story is that he decided not to choose between his father and mother as stated in the movie. and the woman he actually met and married is anna which is why it is the name that the old nemo say or to be precised, REMEMBER. compare to the two ladies, young nemo already had a real interaction with the real anna. it is during the scene where young-anna dive into the swimming pool. and because he did not choose between his parents, he became a homeless man or a pool maintenance guy. i don't know which one, then jump to the ecstatic reunion between the two. how they fall in love with one another is the question. when the middle-aged nemo is living in i think an abandon house, he has a picture of anna. which was probably taken when they were teenagers, not sure if they go to the same school or maybe nemo never really have the chance to go to school. then the old nemo stated that when he was teenager or 15 to be precised. he was in love.

that's my explanation.

and here is one maybe the movie will simply let us decide which story do we prefer, all are equally real, or equally not. :)

share|improve this answer
add comment

Nemo was { psychic } he was never touched by an angel on the lip . At the end he tells the reporter that they were both creation in a nine year old boy's mind . The older version does not exist he is a projection of a projection of the only path that survived to be that age in this life. Everything in the movie at the point of the train-station is in Nemo's mind - I know this sounds crazy but Nemo was never born. In fact that's why it's called Mr. Nobody - He was still in deciding phase of picking a family.

share|improve this answer
add comment

There is a seeming all-knowing quality to 118 year old Nemo, isn't there? How does he know that his own choice of pants to purchase cost a Brazilian his job and caused the very rain that erased Anna's numbers? It is not the only time that this knowledge-beyond-normal-knowing of what caused things to be the way they are, or rather could be (all Butterfly Effect moments) is exhibited.

We are left with a choice: Is it because he was never touched by the angels of oblivion, and never forgot knowing all possible futures? Or is it only that he is an extremely imaginative child? Or maybe a comatose adolescent with a lot of time on his active mind? Or maybe all the above?

The possible philosophical questions here run deep.

What is the nature of life itself? Of consciousness? Of cause and effect? If there is cause and effect, Butterfly effect must happen. But what if there isn't? What if all possible outcomes exist simultaneously side-by-side at the same time, because time itself is not any more real than the measure of the width of something? What if Nemo is the one who sees time like we see distance? Could he then choose which direction to walk in for that distance?

Nemo is Neo. This is the Matrix. Nemo alone has freed himself from the constraints of the machine of the universe. And like Neo, when in a space of nothing where any choice is possible, he chooses love first and foremost with reliability.

A bum on a bench at a lighthouse with hope of true love has a better existence than a wealthy and successful man in a loveless marriage. And may just live to be the oldest mortal.

But where is the Butterfly Effect in this? Even though there are ample examples in the piece of people being impacted by seemingly small things beyond their control, it really seems to be more what they make of it than the event itself that decides their fate. What Father made a freak accident mean was more critical to the failure of his marriage than the accident itself.

Watch the film again, and listen for the various places where people speak of things they have decided. Always, these forceful statements of decision are cutting off possible choices they could make now or in the future, and stand at odds with choice itself. The distinction between the two is clearly different in the mind of the director.

My only real issue with it is the one flaw I can see with choosing not to choose: eventually not choosing becomes your choice. In the end, we must inevitablly choose, and so must Nemo.

I'm just not fully clear on what he did finally choose.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.